losbrad
January 30th, 2007, 09:42 AM
I have been playing MM 2007 for a couple weeks and it is not a bad game.
Iam a 2k guy and have been since NBA2k on dreamcast. I decided to give MM a try because in my opinion the gameplay in college hoop and 2k7 are to similiar and I wanted a change.
The biggest plus to me in MM is that the plays they run by far are better than anyother bball game. College basketball is a game of constant player and ball movement. How they run plays on the game is beautiful. On the other hand I think College Hoops is to stagnant there is not a lot of player movement at all. The edge goes to MM.
Actual player movement(fluidit) hands down goes to college hoops , the guys move so graceful in CH that it is not comparable. There is also still some funky ball physics in MM.
The edge is to CH easily.
Iam not a dynasty guy so Iam just talking about more gameplay here. I will do a season but dont get into the dynasty mode at all so I have no clue how that plays out.
The biggest downside of MM is the players rankings Iam not sure if they even researched them. But u have a ton of players whos ratings are horrible, I mean u have guys who have been 40-45% 3 point shooters with rankings in the 50's for threes. College hoops rosters and rankings are alot better.
Graphics , I like both games graphics. But I give the edge to MM .
I could care less who makes a game I just like a good game and in my mind both of these are. U might have to spend sometime fixing the rosters on MM but the game is still good.
I would give MM a 7.5 and College hoops a 8.5. If College hoops could get there plays down like MM it would easily make it a 9.0 or better in my book.
Iam a 2k guy and have been since NBA2k on dreamcast. I decided to give MM a try because in my opinion the gameplay in college hoop and 2k7 are to similiar and I wanted a change.
The biggest plus to me in MM is that the plays they run by far are better than anyother bball game. College basketball is a game of constant player and ball movement. How they run plays on the game is beautiful. On the other hand I think College Hoops is to stagnant there is not a lot of player movement at all. The edge goes to MM.
Actual player movement(fluidit) hands down goes to college hoops , the guys move so graceful in CH that it is not comparable. There is also still some funky ball physics in MM.
The edge is to CH easily.
Iam not a dynasty guy so Iam just talking about more gameplay here. I will do a season but dont get into the dynasty mode at all so I have no clue how that plays out.
The biggest downside of MM is the players rankings Iam not sure if they even researched them. But u have a ton of players whos ratings are horrible, I mean u have guys who have been 40-45% 3 point shooters with rankings in the 50's for threes. College hoops rosters and rankings are alot better.
Graphics , I like both games graphics. But I give the edge to MM .
I could care less who makes a game I just like a good game and in my mind both of these are. U might have to spend sometime fixing the rosters on MM but the game is still good.
I would give MM a 7.5 and College hoops a 8.5. If College hoops could get there plays down like MM it would easily make it a 9.0 or better in my book.