View Full Version : Is live 08 tryng to prove something
kbdynasty
July 30th, 2007, 04:56 PM
check out these pics of chris paul
http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/sports/nbalive08/images.html?sid=6175754&tag=gumballs;img;1
Oncologist_4_Kids_MD
July 30th, 2007, 04:58 PM
Trying to prove that Chris Paul aka CP3 looks better on the EA GAMES.
THE PLAYER MODELS (FACES AT LEAST FOR 2K) HAVE BEEN GETTING WORSE THOUGH:
2k4:
http://media.xbox.ign.com/media/552/552377/img_1770774.html
2k7:
http://media.xbox360.ign.com/media/792/792368/img_3849997.html
MakaveliThaDon
July 30th, 2007, 05:02 PM
he doesn't he looks skinny
KOOL2K7
July 30th, 2007, 05:02 PM
ea will never ever beat nba 2k games
kbdynasty
July 30th, 2007, 05:04 PM
i agree live will never beat 2k but that 1st pic impresses me alil
nba 2k7 master
July 30th, 2007, 05:57 PM
they aint trying to prove nothing they already proved they the best basketball game already
NJake
July 30th, 2007, 05:58 PM
We have all seen these pics
IVODEM
July 30th, 2007, 06:04 PM
why trash a brand new tread with EA trash not that it's trash
©I34 of ®@P┬o®z
July 30th, 2007, 06:07 PM
why trash a brand new tread with EA trash not that it's trash
I know, why is this guy doing these kind of ******?
EitherRhino80
July 30th, 2007, 10:27 PM
Idon't know but EAs screenshots look crappy. Once again player models have skinny legs and too skinny arms. 2K does make player arms more bigger but still bigger looks better than skinny.
#1_Josh_Boone_Fan
July 30th, 2007, 10:30 PM
neither one looks like chris paul
kbdynasty
July 30th, 2007, 10:35 PM
yea the live 08 players look more cartoony body wise but the faces look pretty good i think both games are gonna have there pros and cons
Lord Arklon
July 30th, 2007, 11:10 PM
I think Live's graphics look better overall, but 2K8 so far looks to be no slouch, for sure. I loved what I saw from the dunk contest, and hopefully VC brings a wealth of gameplay fixes and tweaks to the table this year.
Anyway, I wasn't terribly impressed with the Live videos that I saw. Things looked ok until they started executing movements, particularly layups, it just looks entirely too mechanical, I want it to be smoother.
Superior graphics are one thing, but I think animations and fluidity will drive this gen more than anything else. Then again, it seems that their new dribble mechanic is pretty fluid, but I'll have to have some hands on time with it to be sure.
Prince_RIP4eVa
July 30th, 2007, 11:23 PM
1. Some 2k fanboys will say live's graphics suck and 2k kills them in the graphics department.... that's clearly not true, and it's not even up for debate. We can compare 08's graphics when 2k puts out some clean screens.
2. :rotfl: for a month or 2 to progress there graphics those sure look a LOT worse than the stuff they put out when the game was first announced. The EA hype machine almost got me.....
tspree15
July 30th, 2007, 11:40 PM
What are you guys looking at?
I've been a 2K fan my entire life and hated the last live...I play 2 games of 2K7 each day and can't wait till 2K8 comes out...I check the boards daily for 2k8 info.
Having said that, how can you say that Live doesn't look great...the graphics are unbelievable...the moves are great too. I seriously doubt it will come close to 2K but what I've seen is very impressive.
It doesn't matter which game you're a fan of, you have to see that Live 08 is looking pretty awesome!
Now when are we getting that 2K8 info!
B-B-B-BillupsfoMVP
July 31st, 2007, 06:50 AM
What are you guys looking at?
I've been a 2K fan my entire life and hated the last live...I play 2 games of 2K7 each day and can't wait till 2K8 comes out...I check the boards daily for 2k8 info.
Having said that, how can you say that Live doesn't look great...the graphics are unbelievable...the moves are great too. I seriously doubt it will come close to 2K but what I've seen is very impressive.
It doesn't matter which game you're a fan of, you have to see that Live 08 is looking pretty awesome!
Now when are we getting that 2K8 info!
:rolleyes: we already got some info, where have you been.
and prince_rip4eva just b/c you think 2ks graphics are better dosent mean your some fanboy i like 2ks grahphics maore and i think their better everybody has their own opinion 2k has more realistic bodys while live has better faces (for most of the players, have you seen lives wade it looks nothin like him.) so dont be stereo typing everyone like that.
sleepytercel
July 31st, 2007, 07:16 AM
Personally, in my opinion, movement and fluidity IS graphics. Just because it looks good in a screenshot, to me, doesn't mean the graphics are better. If the game moves like garbage and looks robotic, while the other offers similar graphics and much better visuals when in play, I'll say that the game with good visuals and excellent movement has the better graphics. Seriously, do people play Live and pause the game to awe at its graphics? I guess I never understood why the fluidity of animations isn't considered "graphical", considering it adds to the visuals.
©I34 of ®@P┬o®z
July 31st, 2007, 07:31 AM
1. Some 2k fanboys will say live's graphics suck and 2k kills them in the graphics department.... that's clearly not true.
Even though I play 2K games over Live, I admit that, Live clearly has better graphics, but I think 2K will overcome with better gameplay and more signature moves from mo-cap
JHodge32
July 31st, 2007, 07:35 AM
Live Has great graphics but player models look cartooney
2K8 while not as good in graphics still has fairly good graphics and most likely gameplay.
bosiydid
July 31st, 2007, 07:46 AM
Can someone explain to me what "cartooney" means? Personally, I think the skin textures blow away the glow exhibited by 2k series. What about it is cartooney, to me it looks realistic as hell, even more so then 2k, with the unnatural glow, like angels or something.
Prince_RIP4eVa
July 31st, 2007, 08:03 AM
Personally, in my opinion, movement and fluidity IS graphics. Just because it looks good in a screenshot, to me, doesn't mean the graphics are better. If the game moves like garbage and looks robotic, while the other offers similar graphics and much better visuals when in play, I'll say that the game with good visuals and excellent movement has the better graphics. Seriously, do people play Live and pause the game to awe at its graphics? I guess I never understood why the fluidity of animations isn't considered "graphical", considering it adds to the visuals.
I know what you're saying, and I agree with the fact that the movement and fluidity is a ton better in 2k, but as far as i'm concerned that goes along with animations, which I separate from graphics. That is clearly in 2k's favor..
Jaitsu
July 31st, 2007, 08:14 AM
every1 looks like they haven't eaten in weeks
AKGRIZZFAN32
July 31st, 2007, 09:16 AM
look none of the fans are even watching the play they are looking at other fans and stuff
OnPoint17
July 31st, 2007, 10:42 AM
Even though the Live 08 Chris Paul at least resembles Chris, the thing that's really messed up is the jersey. That yellow jersey looks more like a pull-over sweater than a basketball jersey. EA didn't even come close to how the Hornets jersey looks. And don't let me get started on those balloon short either.
Most Hated
July 31st, 2007, 11:23 AM
Live jersey look better than 2k's onlything EA messed up was the color and shorts but its detailed exactly how it suppose to be.
JHodge32
July 31st, 2007, 11:41 AM
Most Hated is you High?
Live Got Balloon Short
Square Jerseys
messed up jersey detail
messed up jersey color
The jersey's don't move properly.
Atleast 2k moves like a real uni and looks like the real unis
bosiydid
July 31st, 2007, 11:49 AM
Most Hated is you High?
Who's aksin?
Da Roc
July 31st, 2007, 12:11 PM
Most hated is just a scorned live fanboy. He probably works for EA or sumthin. Live Jerseys look better. Haha that is stupid as hell. Live does not look real. It looks great for a cartoon game. But it is not photorealistic. I challenge anyone to go to the CP3 picture released by 2K, put your thumb over his face and tell me that it does not look like an actual photo. The only complaint anyone has is CP3's face. And If you can't tell his is in motion in each shot, that is why his face is blurred.
bosiydid
July 31st, 2007, 12:16 PM
Da Roc,
I'm not fan of the 'angel' glow. You want to talk realistic? How about not making the players look like they could glow in the dark. No doubt sweat reflects a little of the light and what ever but come on. What about live is cartoonish, I've asked this question a number of times but no one answers. I'll take Lives skin texture, faces and jersey texture every day of the week and twice on Sunday. So again, what about Live players is cartoonish?
Most Hated
July 31st, 2007, 12:17 PM
Most hated is just a scorned live fanboy. He probably works for EA or sumthin. Live Jerseys look better. Haha that is stupid as hell. Live does not look real. It looks great for a cartoon game. But it is not photorealistic. I challenge anyone to go to the CP3 picture released by 2K, put your thumb over his face and tell me that it does not look like an actual photo. The only complaint anyone has is CP3's face. And If you can't tell his is in motion in each shot, that is why his face is blurred.
Im not a fan of either and im not high off Da Roc like you crackhead.
JMack123
July 31st, 2007, 12:29 PM
Da Roc,
I'm not fan of the 'angel' glow. You want to talk realistic? How about not making the players look like they could glow in the dark. No doubt sweat reflects a little of the light and what ever but come on. What about live is cartoonish, I've asked this question a number of times but no one answers. I'll take Lives skin texture, faces and jersey texture every day of the week and twice on Sunday. So again, what about Live players is cartoonish?
Well, part of the problem is that they are all WAY too skinny. When you look at the players and certainly when u look at them in motion, they look like cartoon characters. I mean LIVE fans can claim they hav better graphics but it is still null and void when your players all run around like a hunched over granny.
bosiydid
July 31st, 2007, 12:39 PM
Unrealistic...maybe, but cartooney? Faces are much more accurately represented then in 2k this one isn't even debatable, don't have the unrealistic skin glow, overall the skin texture puts 2k to shame. Look at any pic of an NBA player and then look at the two screens and tell me that 2k is more realistic then Live.
Da Roc
July 31st, 2007, 12:42 PM
First of Most Hated that was a dumb comeback. Secondly live players skin texture is not realistic at all. They have no real shadding. The lighting effects are dull as if they are playing in a highschool. Also the player body features are horribly done. You can interchange Amares legs with CP3's legs. Please explain. There are no players with bigger biceps then thigh muscles. It just doesn't happen. And there Jeresey are pathetic. They look like the are wearing skirts on each toothpick. Oops I mean leg.
Jaitsu
July 31st, 2007, 12:43 PM
look none of the fans are even watching the play they are looking at other fans and stuff
true, and whats with the OKC badge?
bosiydid
July 31st, 2007, 12:55 PM
First of Most Hated that was a dumb comeback. Secondly live players skin texture is not realistic at all. They have no real shadding. The lighting effects are dull as if they are playing in a highschool. Also the player body features are horribly done. You can interchange Amares legs with CP3's legs. Please explain. There are no players with bigger biceps then thigh muscles. It just doesn't happen. And there Jeresey are pathetic. They look like the are wearing skirts on each toothpick. Oops I mean leg.
- Skin textures....scroll down for comparison pics (http://www.nbaliveforums.com/ftopic50348.php) <- link.....You mean to tell me that in those pics there is no lighting effects and that 2k's glow is more realistic? If can't see how IDIOTIC your comment is regarding skin tone, why bother with the rest of it. Come on man, develop even a shred of objectivity and give credit where it's due.
- I agree with you regarding legs and more importantly knees and thighs.
- Again, simply crazy regarding the jerseys. Instead of being an ignorant a**whipe go look at the game in action and spew that crap regarding toothpicks.
If you had an objective bone in your body it would be someone on IGN's staff screwing you.
Most Hated
July 31st, 2007, 12:55 PM
First of Most Hated that was a dumb comeback. Secondly live players skin texture is not realistic at all. They have no real shadding. The lighting effects are dull as if they are playing in a highschool. Also the player body features are horribly done. You can interchange Amares legs with CP3's legs. Please explain. There are no players with bigger biceps then thigh muscles. It just doesn't happen. And there Jeresey are pathetic. They look like the are wearing skirts on each toothpick. Oops I mean leg.
Excuse me, are you saying something?
http://www.sportsgamer.com/content/964/
Nah nah you cant tell me nothing.
LOL at 2k's Baron Davis look like he have a boner, go cover that pic face and ask yourself do that look photo realistic.
JHodge32
July 31st, 2007, 01:05 PM
It ain't a boner, 2K's jerseys actualy MOVE unlike Live's
Look at Lives square jerseys and skirts, IVE SEEN THEM IN 06,07,&08.
http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n11/TymesRhymes/livesquare.jpg
Most Hated
July 31st, 2007, 01:44 PM
http://www.nba.com/gallery/pg_chris_paul_2.html
Live Jersey is on point 2k cant even detail it right.
http://www.nba.com/gallery/pg_kobe_bryant_4.html
In 2k his jersey would have been by his ears but not in real life.
MoCity360
July 31st, 2007, 01:54 PM
pics mean nothing...EA servers are trash, just like Live
JHodge32
July 31st, 2007, 02:00 PM
You just a stubborn Live Fanboy MH you afraid to admit that 2K is better.
Most Hated
July 31st, 2007, 02:00 PM
pics mean nothing...EA servers are trash, just like Live
LOL its funny how you 2k fans need to bring up something else when you cant back up something, beat it punk.
JHodge32
July 31st, 2007, 02:02 PM
I did back my **** up you need to do yours.
Most Hated
July 31st, 2007, 02:03 PM
You just a stubborn Live Fanboy MH you afraid to admit that 2K is better.
Im a fan of the NBA and I like to play NBA games and 2k7 was the better game but both games do somethings better than the other one, 2k fans is the ones that cant admit the truth.
JHodge32
July 31st, 2007, 02:10 PM
I ain't gonna argue with you anymore lets just back on track.
Most Hated
July 31st, 2007, 02:16 PM
I ain't gonna argue with you anymore lets just back on track.
You cant thats why.
Da Roc
July 31st, 2007, 02:17 PM
Boysi are you serious. Objectivity, trick please. You need to get your eyes checked homegirl. Live players look like they are made of clay. They are lifeless and robotic. Also you have the nerve to call me arrogant. Were every other post you claiming to be a software designer and ish. Telling people that 2K is lying and there can't be anyway there at 60%. How arrogant is that.
Lastly if anybody is getting pumped it's you, EA got you out tricking on a 2K site, standing up for them like your they boo or somethin. :rotfl:
bosiydid
July 31st, 2007, 02:49 PM
Boysi are you serious. Objectivity, trick please. You need to get your eyes checked homegirl. Live players look like they are made of clay. They are lifeless and robotic. Also you have the nerve to call me arrogant. Were every other post you claiming to be a software designer and ish. Telling people that 2K is lying and there can't be anyway there at 60%. How arrogant is that.
Lastly if anybody is getting pumped it's you, EA got you out tricking on a 2K site, standing up for them like your they boo or somethin. :rotfl:
Da Roc,
A few points.....
- If you go back and show me where I called you arrogant I'll leave and never come back. If you are confusing arrogant with ignorant then you indeed are as dumb as you sound. You don't have the mental fortitude to engage me in a debate, as you've come to a gun fight with a knife.
- The comments regarding Live players looking like "clay" is your opinion and is far from fact. While you are entitled to your opinion you are NOT entitled to your own facts.
- Again, you appear to be about as dense as they come. I've said that in years past I played live almost exclusively and this year was the first time I ever picked up 2k. I was blown away by the realism and will never again except live as the only alternative. I'll wait for reviews and buy one and there is a better then good chance it will be NBA2k. So try as you might in slandering me as a Live "lover" etc. you will be unsuccessful, in fact it appears that it's your only defense at this point, since otherwise you don't have a di#@ to stand on. I've also pointed out that I work in IT (network analyst), that isn't an embellishment but fact, and even though I don't design software I'm around guys all day that do so I know a bit regarding projects of this magnitude. So when your knowledge of computers goes beyond posting on this board, using a keyboard; then come talk smack about where this game is in the development process.
I've said that it is entirely possible that they chose to show an older (60%) build of the game. So not only are you dumb but you also posses zero reading comprehension skills.
This is being objective, instead of just regurgitating the crap you do. No doubt 2K is the by far and away better series at this point in time, but it doesn't mean it will alway remain that way no matter how much you want it to be so. I'm also comfortable enough with my choice of games that I can say, even though live looks good they have a long....long way to go in the gameplay department, while 2k could certainly do better with the faces etc.
In the mean time here's a dollar, go buy some objective/critical thinking skills instead of blowing it on Da Roc. Crack kills!
Da Roc
July 31st, 2007, 03:48 PM
Wow I guess you told me. I really would hope that your pathetic rambling has a point. I do not feel it even remotely necessary to engage you in a debate over your Opinion on the graphical prowess of NBA Live. I am not sure if you have a inferiority complex, therefore you fill it necessary to make ignorant snap judgments of someone you have no clue about. So instead of listing accomplishment or embellishing my profession I will simple make two points, first please before you insult some ones objectivity try not to contradict yourself. You said in your long videogame dissertation that this was your first year picking up 2K, but in the next sentence you stated that you will no longer accept live as the only alternative. So why is Live an alternative, what animosity were you harboring towards 2K. Looks to me that you were being non-objective. A title which you seem so quick to label me with.
Secondly this is the second time you have tried to make an association between my User name Da Roc and an actual drug. Let me be the first to educate you, you ignorant twit. The name Da Roc is a derivative of the position I hold in my fraternal organization. Not some teeny bopper who thinks it cool to link my self with the illegal drug scene.
Now who would benefit from some critical thinking skills you pathetic, egotistical, halfwit?
bosiydid
July 31st, 2007, 04:37 PM
Wow I guess you told me. I really would hope that your pathetic rambling has a point. I do not feel it even remotely necessary to engage you in a debate over your Opinion on the graphical prowess of NBA Live. I am not sure if you have a inferiority complex, therefore you fill it necessary to make ignorant snap judgments of someone you have no clue about. So instead of listing accomplishment or embellishing my profession I will simple make two points, first please before you insult some ones objectivity try not to contradict yourself. You said in your long videogame dissertation that this was your first year picking up 2K, but in the next sentence you stated that you will no longer accept live as the only alternative. So why is Live an alternative, what animosity were you harboring towards 2K. Looks to me that you were being non-objective. A title which you seem so quick to label me with.
Secondly this is the second time you have tried to make an association between my User name Da Roc and an actual drug. Let me be the first to educate you, you ignorant twit. The name Da Roc is a derivative of the position I hold in my fraternal organization. Not some teeny bopper who thinks it cool to link my self with the illegal drug scene.
Now who would benefit from some critical thinking skills you pathetic, egotistical, halfwit?
Da Roc (aka. Crack user)
I wasn't even the one who originally referred to you that way but it's becoming more apparent with each passing post that the original poster was correct. You also display a serious lack of reading comprehension skills, and I will not bore the rest of the community breaking my earlier post down for you. English is a second language to me as I was not born in this country. Apparently to you it's a 3rd or 4th language.
The last thing I have to say regarding your post is ......."what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
Da Roc
July 31st, 2007, 04:51 PM
For this great debater you definitely seem to revert back to name calling a whole lot. For a while there I actually thought you may be over 18. But after seeing every cliché in the book posted at the bottom of you response, I am giving that some serious reconsideration.
And you’re right you have been boring everyone in this thread half to death.
Also I should have remembered you were from some Euro country. Five bucks says France. That would explain a lot.
USA Chump :salute:
jtrainn24
July 31st, 2007, 04:54 PM
i hate the way live games play. the players just float into the air, the view was horrible. just in my opinion though...
bosiydid
July 31st, 2007, 04:59 PM
Nope......wrong again! Ukraine; ten bucks says you can't even find it on the map, I'd be surprised if you could find Europe on the map. Ignorance is blissssss.......errr....or was that arrogance, ehhhh who cares as long as your in a fraternity and can pound back as many beers as you can get your grubby hands on.
Anyway, go take a debate class and then come back, perhaps then we can have some meaningful dialog then. On second thought, perhaps you can start with an English class first, go for the easy stuff.
bosiydid
July 31st, 2007, 05:00 PM
i hate the way live games play. the players just float into the air, the view was horrible. just in my opinion though...
No amount of decent graphics can hide the awful game play of the Live games over the last 2 or 3 years at least. You are right, it was downright unplayable.
Da Roc
July 31st, 2007, 05:04 PM
Yep that proves it, not even 18. You haven't seen a college campus. Fraternity all about pounding back beers? Haha I’m sure you probably taking 10 grade debate along with AP algebra. Haha. What a young dush. Yeah you probably interning at Gamestop talking about you have a IT job. :rotfl:
HennessyRob
July 31st, 2007, 06:11 PM
That doesn't look like CP3 at all.
NJake
July 31st, 2007, 06:15 PM
I AM A LOSER!..
Dont beat yourself up because you are different...
JHodge32
July 31st, 2007, 06:47 PM
You cant thats why.
No I can't because you a thick headed Live's *****.
Prince_RIP4eVa
July 31st, 2007, 07:03 PM
I think live IS trying to prove something... and they were successfull.
They succeeded in proving that Chris Paul will be in live 08..:thumbsup:
JayMizzle
July 31st, 2007, 07:08 PM
EA has some nerve..."yes our gameplay sux, but hey our player models are almost photogenic." lol
Most Hated
July 31st, 2007, 07:08 PM
No I can't because you a thick headed Live's *****.
Hated by most loved by many respected by all. There is a reason why my name is Most Hated on these forums because you 2ktoysoilders cant compete with real facts. B***h If it wasnt for EA 2k wouldnt have a idea so you should love them, they take so much from EA its ridculous look at them now they have work in progress in their pics just like EA did last year.
NJake
July 31st, 2007, 07:52 PM
I need to get a life.
Did you honestly write that?
JHodge32
July 31st, 2007, 08:04 PM
Oh hold up are you directing that at me NJake?
Why Would I write that about myself?
Q-Qadgetry
July 31st, 2007, 08:17 PM
http://xboxmedia.ign.com/xbox/image/ss_nba2k4_xbox_04_lg.jpg
lmao what the hell??
MichaelPittman32
July 31st, 2007, 11:53 PM
dude one problem is with 2k the jerseys are dodgy as hell, but im never gon doubt the gameplay on 2K, EA graphics look sweet but i know for sure the gameplay is rank. im converting back to 2K basketball fo sure, i had 2k6 but then got Live.
NJake
July 31st, 2007, 11:58 PM
Nah JHodge, I just saw that and I was puzzled, thats all
eye guy
August 1st, 2007, 03:43 AM
http://www.nba.com/gallery/pg_chris_paul_2.html
Live Jersey is on point 2k cant even detail it right.
http://www.nba.com/gallery/pg_kobe_bryant_4.html
In 2k his jersey would have been by his ears but not in real life.
Are you able to post a comparison between these shots and shots from 2K7 in the same situation??? Because i'd have to disagree... The cloth movemnt in 2k's games are nearly spot on.