View Full Version : Best covering bronze LB?
CmV
October 27th, 2007, 11:47 PM
Which bronze linebacker is best a covering a WR?
Brad Van Pelt
John Anderson
Robert Brazile
Other?
hibachiii
October 28th, 2007, 12:02 AM
Probably Van Pelt. I think he's the tallest out of all of them too.
AlexJones27
October 28th, 2007, 05:09 AM
Van Pelt and Brazile. Van Pelt is a bronze version of Dave Wilcox without the run coverage. Brazile is so tall that he bats alot of ball down. Both good.
AlexJones27
October 28th, 2007, 05:15 AM
Which bronze linebacker is best a covering a WR?
Brad Van Pelt
John Anderson
Robert Brazile
Other?
I hope you mean a slot reciever??? Lol Unless they are running a slant most recievers will torch a linebacker. Are you playing your base formation and not a Nickle/Dime?
LSUTIGERSPHXSUNS
October 28th, 2007, 06:21 AM
Brazile works for me best on the strong side, and VanPelt on the weak side. They both can cover tight ends really well, and even generic recievers.
AlexJones27
October 28th, 2007, 06:31 AM
Brazile works for me best on the strong side, and VanPelt on the weak side. They both can cover tight ends really well, and even generic recievers.
That combo works well for me too. Keep that a secret. Actually bury this thread.
LSUTIGERSPHXSUNS
October 28th, 2007, 06:32 AM
never tried John anderson though
Valdarez
October 28th, 2007, 07:59 AM
You can't go wrong with 'Mr. Anderson'.
Njake.
October 28th, 2007, 09:05 AM
John Anderson is a beast. If anyone is a bronze version of Dave Wilcox, it is Anderson. He has the best hands in the game for a LB next to Wilcox. I think he is faster than Brazile and Van Pelt.
note: I have all 3 on my team. (Brazille, Anderson, Van Pelt.)
Phaith01
October 28th, 2007, 09:09 AM
Otis Wilson then do manual coverage, otherwise you will get burned 75% of the time in a man situation with a cpu controlled lb on a wr.