View Full Version : Avoid XY RIDES AGAIN
AlexJones27
November 12th, 2007, 10:21 PM
Kid froze the game. Waste of time. The stupid server gave me the loss and the drop.
JHova1982
November 13th, 2007, 01:25 AM
I just play this cat who uses every cheese tactic you can think of. you name it he probably did it that game. but i came out the winner 20-17. he had his gold tiers and silver in his secondary with a silver RB and 3 WR a FS a Qb cant remember the other two for bronze. Ran 2 bump majority of the time but he did give me different looks on who was guarding my players
I had to overcome the cheating that was going on the field and his defense wasnt cole just cheap. i still pass for over 200 yards and ran for 100 and then gave me a neutral feedback
I wont play that punk again
J_Frank
November 13th, 2007, 04:23 AM
I just play this cat who uses every cheese tactic you can think of. you name it he probably did it that game. but i came out the winner 20-17. he had his gold tiers and silver in his secondary with a silver RB and 3 WR a FS a Qb cant remember the other two for bronze. Ran 2 bump majority of the time but he did give me different looks on who was guarding my players
I had to overcome the cheating that was going on the field and his defense wasnt cole just cheap. i still pass for over 200 yards and ran for 100 and then gave me a neutral feedback
I wont play that punk again
:thumbsdow
Sound like a crybaby to me, so what if a ran bump, zone, or whatever. What you guys FAIL to realize is any and every person you play online has the option of playing any way they want.
Want to go for two or onside it every time shure it might not be the most "sim" style of game but you funny cats on here need to stop it.
If someone is running bump, motion your receivers or quick outs/ins to your TE as lbs can't bump.
There running zones. use alot of bunch formations placing all of your receivers on one side, murdering thier zone.
Honestly to many people complain in this game and after 400+ games under my belt and being ranked top tier and beating "many "( not everyone) on here I still don't see what's the problem.
I played this one cat who had a created Gold Qb, with 4 speed burner Wrs, man it was damn near impossible to stop, but I pevailed and adjusted and did'nt or NEVER come on here screaming cheese.
For the original poster shame you got freezed, but it's a glitch just like the fg that is the only reason Igive neg feedback
, peace
JHova1982
November 13th, 2007, 09:08 AM
J Frank how am i crying if i said i won the game. must didnt read the post right but anyways i was pointing out how he was playing me. he use every glitch move u can think of in this game and i still came out the winner and then he gave a neutral after that and thats why im not playin him again
Im in the top 50 with a 90 percent feedback so i have nothin to cry about buddy
tpaterniti
November 13th, 2007, 09:15 AM
XY Rides Again, huh? Those math nerds are the worst.
amid
November 13th, 2007, 09:18 AM
XY Rides Again, huh? Those math nerds are the worst.
I could always solve for x, but those ys always left me baffled about 99.9% of the time.
Get Crazy
November 13th, 2007, 10:07 AM
I just play this cat who uses every cheese tactic you can think of. you name it he probably did it that game. but i came out the winner 20-17. he had his gold tiers and silver in his secondary with a silver RB and 3 WR a FS a Qb cant remember the other two for bronze. Ran 2 bump majority of the time but he did give me different looks on who was guarding my players
I had to overcome the cheating that was going on the field and his defense wasnt cole just cheap. i still pass for over 200 yards and ran for 100 and then gave me a neutral feedback
I wont play that punk again
You didn't name any of the glitch or cheese tactics used
tpaterniti
November 13th, 2007, 11:27 AM
I could always solve for x, but those ys always left me baffled about 99.9% of the time.
Well we'll start with a simple problem:
Let's say your problem is
x + 1 = 5, y + x = 12
Simply solve for x first. If x + 1 = 5, then x = 4.
Next, plug x back into the other equation. If y + x = 12 and x = 4, then y + 4 = 12.
So then y = 8.
Here is a more difficult one.
3x - 2y = 16, y + x = 12
Well we have to solve for x first again. x = 12 - y
Now we plug this into the first equation. 3(12 - y) - 2y = 16
Now distribute. 36 - 3y - 2y = 16
Collect your terms. 36 - 5y = 16
Divide both sides by 5 to isolate y. Here is where it gets a little ugly. 36/5 - y = 16/5
20/5 = y
y = 4
Now we plug our value for y back into either original equation. y + x = 12 is easiest. So then
4 + x = 12, x = 8.
Thus y = 4, x = 8. If we plug these values back into our original equations we see that they work.
Original equation 1: x + y = 12; (8) + (4) = 12. Yes!
Original Equation 2: 3x - 2y = 16; 3(8) - 2(4) = 16 or 24 - 8 = 16. Yes!
Now you can never say you didn't do anything constructive on this forum.
amid
November 13th, 2007, 11:33 AM
Well we'll start with a simple problem:
Let's say your problem is
x + 1 = 5, y + x = 12
Simply solve for x first. If x + 1 = 5, then x = 4.
Next, plug x back into the other equation. If y + x = 12 and x = 4, then y + 4 = 12.
So then y = 8.
Here is a more difficult one.
3x - 2y = 16, y + x = 12
Well we have to solve for x first again. x = 12 - y
Now we plug this into the first equation. 3(12 - y) - 2y = 16
Now distribute. 36 - 3y - 2y = 16
Collect your terms. 36 - 5y = 16
Divide both sides by 5 to isolate y. Here is where it gets a little ugly. 36/5 - y = 16/5
20/5 = y
y = 4
Now we plug our value for y back into either original equation. y + x = 12 is easiest. So then
4 + x = 12, x = 8.
Thus y = 4, x = 8. If we plug these values back into our original equations we see that they work.
Original equation 1: x + y = 12; (8) + (4) = 12. Yes!
Original Equation 2: 3x - 2y = 16; 3(8) - 2(4) = 16 or 24 - 8 = 16. Yes!
Now you can never say you didn't do anything constructive on this forum.
tpaterniti,
I can do it that way, but my algebra teacher said solving x first was cheese, so I stopped doing it like that. I've been a loser in math ever since.
gt: tjspeaks
tpaterniti
November 13th, 2007, 01:11 PM
Well solving for x first is easier so it is total cheese. It takes no skill to do and it exploits a glitch in the system because it actually works. Also, if you solve for x first, y gives you bad feedback. If you solve for y first then x is equally upset. It is a no-win situation so I must advise you to avoid algebra altogether.
Big M
November 13th, 2007, 04:43 PM
Wow. I just realized that I seriously need to pay more attention in math.
nflhitman
November 13th, 2007, 04:53 PM
Are you serious JHOVA? You call him cheese because of how he put his team together? So now you are cheese about how you put your team together?? Get REAL!
tpaterniti
November 13th, 2007, 06:11 PM
Wow. I just realized that I seriously need to pay more attention in math.
There you go, that's the spirit. No child left behind. It starts right here baby.