PDA

View Full Version : Im telling you guys GET PS3: Have options


Tribefansince1990
December 12th, 2007, 07:26 AM
Let me start off by saying I LOVE BASEBALL and BASEBALL VIDEO GAMES like you would not believe i have a life also but when times get tough i love just sitting back and focusing on something else in life like video games, baseball games specifically are important to me theyre not my life but if i said it doesnt excite me, helps me pass time and almost limit me to no bordom i'd be lying.
IF baseball is your favourite sport and video game and you have a 360 its best to trade it in hoenstly. I had a 360 and it broke down on me (go figure) and ever since i couldnt be happier that it happened. I got a PS3 knowing the quality sony always puts out on almost every piece of electronics it has. and if baseball is what u care about and u can live without gears of war and Halo and like sports games best GET A PS3! does it cost money? sure but now with price cuts its attainable and if you trade in your 360 along with some games and accessories you should have NO PROBLEMS purchasing a PS3 and will most likely have some money left over for a game or two.
2k8 im sure will be better than last year im assuming but even if it is wouldnt u rather have 2 games? i know when EA stopped making baseball games alot of people were upset and it makes sense it was a great series but not only that u had options u could get MVP and 2K or rent them and see what u liked better. this way u always knew u would find at least one tittle appealing every spring/summer to play. if u own a 360 u do not have options your stuck with 2k products which isnt the worst thing but if the last few years are any indication its not the best thing either.
why have 1 when u can have 2? and the second being the show, being the best most consistent baseball gaming franchise. uve seen the news its not going to dissapoint this year it never really does, is it perfect? no but its alot closer than 2K baseball.
360 although has the most games at the present time it is also now known for being NOTORIOUSLY the most unreliable and has cost microsoft over 1.2 BILLION in repairs. you know it i know it we all know it. its really a rushed piece of garbage but people get sucked in because of games and because all your freinds have it. Is it really worth it if your a die hard baseball fan? seriously guys switch over, im in no way involved in Sony or anyhting like that I work overnight at a Grocery Store im just a Tech Geek who loves baseball and Video games. hope this changes a few peoples minds.

MLB 2K8 AND MLB 08 THE SHOW I cant wait...

NYMetros
December 12th, 2007, 01:35 PM
i was thinking about converting for a while and you just convinced me to do so. Besides, i saw mlb 08 the show and it looks insane.

Tribefansince1990
December 12th, 2007, 01:47 PM
u wont regret it man ur making the right choice.

Angels02'
December 12th, 2007, 02:37 PM
Me and my bro have a 360 & a PS2 , so I play the 2k baseball games and he plays The Show.He said he's been thinking about getting a PS3 so he can play the better version of The Show.

I hope he gets that PS3 so I can play The Show too.I didn't really like it on the PS2 because of the horrible graphics.I usually don't care about a games graphics but that game looked ugly.

rios15
December 12th, 2007, 02:38 PM
a man brother lol. go ps3!

yanksfanman319
December 12th, 2007, 02:46 PM
Tribesfan..your an *******..now you've convinced me to get a ps3! haha im jk bro. anyway, how much do you guys think i can get for a xbox 360 with all the cables, two wireless controllers, RockBand,Assassin's Creed,MLB 2K7, Crackdown, and a guitar hero II guitar?

rios15
December 12th, 2007, 02:53 PM
I would say 500-700 $ maybe?

chad0034
December 12th, 2007, 02:58 PM
i dk that kind of stuff but i wonder what i could get for my 360 Call of Duty 4, Madden 08, NHL 08, and Dead Rising ... and how much do used PS3's cost at Gamestop .. i dc if its used as long as it works ..same w/ games

yanksfanman319
December 12th, 2007, 03:08 PM
you really think i can get 500 dollars + for all that stuff?

chad0034
December 12th, 2007, 03:14 PM
i dk about that.. i heard they usually give about half for the 360 .. around 150 .. or 200 (not that good) .. and those games are probly some good money too .. so i dk .. i dont think 500 tho.. mayb 300 - 350

chad0034
December 12th, 2007, 03:15 PM
i mite sell mine to a friend for like 275 or something thatd really help

yanksfanman319
December 12th, 2007, 03:22 PM
i dk about that.. i heard they usually give about half for the 360 .. around 150 .. or 200 (not that good) .. and those games are probly some good money too .. so i dk .. i dont think 500 tho.. mayb 300 - 350

i think ill call up gamestop and see how much i can get everything for..and if it comes to 300-350 then ill sell it to them..but do you guys think ppl would buy it for more on ebay?

chad0034
December 12th, 2007, 03:27 PM
yea but thats soo much more difficult ... thats why i hate that.. and lemme know how much they tell you all that stuff is worth and individual if u can ... thanks

RKO BLACK RKO
December 12th, 2007, 03:39 PM
Tribesfan..your an *******..now you've convinced me to get a ps3! haha im jk bro. anyway, how much do you guys think i can get for a xbox 360 with all the cables, two wireless controllers, RockBand,Assassin's Creed,MLB 2K7, Crackdown, and a guitar hero II guitar?


i know this 4 a fact i live at the gamecrazy lol and i asked to look up all these prices 4 u lol

xbox 360 = 200

2 wireless controllers = 20 together 10 each

if its the big rockband pack with everything = 60

assassins creed = 33

mlb 2k7 = $5.75< so *** but we r gonna say 6 bucks for adding purposes

crack down = 20

gh2 guitar = 15

so basiclly u get $343 buck for all that and i can promise u it will b less at gamestop because the world know gamestop has lesser trade value than game crazy lol

so there u go sry its not the 500-700 u were looking 4 and the guy that said that it was gonna b that much wow just wow

yanksfanman319
December 12th, 2007, 03:39 PM
Okay well, I actually got intouch with EBX cause Gamestop said they couldnt tell me over the phone cause they had to scan the games. But, im sure the prices would be similar so here is what they told me of what i can remember: 360 along with controller and wires you would get 150, 30 dollars for Assassins Creed, 20 for Rockband, 18 dollars for my extra wireless controller, 5 dollars for mlb 2k7, 3 for crackdown, 15 dollars for Hard Drive. So about $251. Now I want to see how much a used console is and if there actually reliable..

yanksfanman319
December 12th, 2007, 03:41 PM
i know this 4 a fact i live at the gamecrazy lol and i asked to look up all these prices 4 u lol

xbox 360 = 200

2 wireless controllers = 20 together 10 each

if its the big rockband pack with everything = 60

assassins creed = 33

mlb 2k7 = $5.75< so *** but we r gonna say 6 bucks for adding purposes

crack down = 20

gh2 guitar = 15

so basiclly u get $343 buck for all that and i can promise u it will b less at gamestop because the world know gamestop has lesser trade value than game crazy lol

so there u go sry its not the 500-700 u were looking 4 and the guy that said that it was gonna b that much wow just wow

thanks i just saw your response. thanks for checking that for me..the only thing is i dont have the bundle..but where do you live? like you dont have to tell me what town but like..state. cause i live in NJ and i dont know of any gamecrazies around where i am

RKO BLACK RKO
December 12th, 2007, 03:47 PM
thanks i just saw your response. thanks for checking that for me..the only thing is i dont have the bundle..but where do you live? like you dont have to tell me what town but like..state. cause i live in NJ and i dont know of any gamecrazies around where i am


i live n aurora, IL its a north western suburb to chiicago and yea if its not the bundle then its 30 and my bad crackdown is 10 not 20 lol cant read my own handwriting lol

http://www.gamecrazy.com/

and if u go there u can look n the left right corner it says store locator lol and just put n yo zip code and bam there it is itll tell u how far u gotta go

SkillSDominicano
December 12th, 2007, 03:48 PM
i live in NJ and there is a gamecrazy where live.

chad0034
December 12th, 2007, 03:56 PM
so basically the only way i can afford a PS3 and a game or 2.. is if i sell my friend the 360 for 250-275.. the go to game stop and trade in NHL 08,COD4 and Madden 08

yanksfanman319
December 12th, 2007, 03:57 PM
unless you dont want to tell me which im sure you wont..but what town do you live in? cause i did that store locater thing and the closest is down the shore..and thats 2 hours away from where i am

SkillSDominicano
December 12th, 2007, 03:59 PM
I can tell you the county i live in which mercer county.

Tribefansince1990
December 12th, 2007, 04:01 PM
For me I got lazy and didnt send my 360 in for repairs I sold 11 games about 4 newer tittles, 3 games to my one freind and basically let him off and got maybe $30 total two controllers HD cables Cables for hooking up a 360 to a monitor (for Projector Which sucked by the way)

This is in Canada the PS3 price at the time ( June) was $549 for the 60GB then tax which is about $610 total after trading in my 8 games two controllers and cables I ended up paying $215 for a playstation 3 and that was WITHOUT taking back my 360 CONSOLE cuz i was too lazy to mail it away get it fixed then sell it, its actually under my bed right now and will be in the garbage soon most likely. and thats worth $200 the chick told me if it had not broken down. so that right there would have left me paying $15 for a PS3 and now they have the 40GB for $399 out and the 60GB the one i have is now down to $499 i believe. If you trade in your xbox 360 with about 5 games and 2 controllers you should clear the PS3 price easy.

Im feeling the love on here trust me this is the right move if your die hard baseball, and lets face it if you werent die hard baseball you wouldnt be on these boards right?


Also a great thing is ONLINE is free unlike xbox live where u pay $60/year. this means alot more online leagues alot more fun and for not just less but NO MONEY!
When u switch over, right away you'll feel more secure with a PS3 it purrs like a cat unlike 360 that makes so much noise u think its going to explode.
and if THAT doesnt make u think twice u get a Blu Ray player for well under retail price. Im not a huge fan of action movies or anything but they do look great with Blu Ray and xbox wants u to fork out another $200 for an HD DVD player? screw that


PS3 owners who love baseball sims. get twice the fun 2K8 and THE SHOW!

SkillSDominicano
December 12th, 2007, 04:01 PM
here the GAME CRAZY near where i live - 1740 NORTH OLDEN AVE SUITE A3, EWING, NJ 8638

RKO BLACK RKO
December 12th, 2007, 04:05 PM
For me I got lazy and didnt send my 360 in for repairs I sold 11 games about 4 newer tittles, 3 games to my one freind and basically let him off and got maybe $30 total two controllers HD cables Cables for hooking up a 360 to a monitor (for Projector Which sucked by the way)

This is in Canada the PS3 price at the time ( June) was $549 for the 60GB then tax which is about $610 total after trading in my 8 games two controllers and cables I ended up paying $215 for a playstation 3 and that was WITHOUT taking back my 360 CONSOLE cuz i was too lazy to mail it away get it fixed then sell it, its actually under my bed right now and will be in the garbage soon most likely. and thats worth $200 the chick told me if it had not broken down. so that right there would have left me paying $15 for a PS3 and now they have the 40GB for $399 out and the 60GB the one i have is now down to $499 i believe. If you trade in your xbox 360 with about 5 games and 2 controllers you should clear the PS3 price easy.

Im feeling the love on here trust me this is the right move if your die hard baseball, and lets face it if you werent die hard baseball you wouldnt be on these boards right?


Also a great thing is ONLINE is free unlike xbox live where u pay $60/year. this means alot more online leagues alot more fun and for not just less but NO MONEY!
When u switch over, right away you'll feel more secure with a PS3 it purrs like a cat unlike 360 that makes so much noise u think its going to explode.
and if THAT doesnt make u think twice u get a Blu Ray player for well under retail price. Im not a huge fan of action movies or anything but they do look great with Blu Ray and xbox wants u to fork out another $200 for an HD DVD player? screw that


PS3 owners who love baseball sims. get twice the fun 2K8 and THE SHOW!

:confused:

dude for somebody that is not "affiliated" with sony and not affiliated with "the show" u sure azz hell seems to b squezzing sonys jockstrap kinda hard

chad0034
December 12th, 2007, 04:08 PM
i tihnk im going to try it.. ill ask my friend if he wants to buy it.. for 250.. then NHL 08=$20 COD4=$25 Madden 08=$25 so 70 + 20 (already on card)+150+50(X mas $)=290.. i think ill have enough.. hopefuly cuz i really want the show.. i just have to get used to PS controllers

yanksfanman319
December 12th, 2007, 04:09 PM
Here is a list of what I am planning on selling:
-Xbox 360 w/ Wireless controller and cables
-20 GB Harddrive
-Assassins Creed,Crackdown,MLB 2K7, and Rock Band (Not the bundle)
-Another wireless controller
-Guitar Hero II wired guitar
EBX tells me they will give me a little over 250 for that.
Do you guys think I should do it? Or will I get a better price going onto ebay?

chad0034
December 12th, 2007, 04:09 PM
hey TribesFan ... wanna join my MLB 2k8 Fantasy Baseball League on www.Cbssports.com

RKO BLACK RKO
December 12th, 2007, 04:14 PM
OK I WANT EVERYBODY TO LISTEN UP

i think we all should calm down we r all hyped up and mad and freaking out because the shhow beat us 2 the punch with info and we r seeing this and is like OMG BLAH BLAH BLAH the show is good ps3 is better lol nNNNNOOOO just wait the few more days or hours whichever comes first till we get our mlb 2k8 news and everybody will b fine and go back to normal lol just wait every 1 it will come and we will b happy with what we read:thumbsup:

chad0034
December 12th, 2007, 04:18 PM
lol true .. i was getting pumped bout getting a PS3 .. im not going to do anything crazy like sell it tomorrow .. im going to wait to see if 2k8 gives us good news... if it doesnt look like it has good potential .. (kinda like Ronny Cedeno).. then ill just get rid of it (what the cubs should do)

this is def. a big yr for 2ksports.. they could affect all of us if the game doesnt look good ...

SkillSDominicano
December 12th, 2007, 04:19 PM
I agree with what ur saying. I mean even when we get the news we will still have to wait until the game comes out. This is all about being patience and waiting.

chad0034
December 12th, 2007, 04:24 PM
can some1 tell me how to make my font bigger.. everytime i go to that font sizer it just has a bunch of weird A*S*S words on it ... thanks again

SkillSDominicano
December 12th, 2007, 04:30 PM
Wow the font thing on here is messed up. Sry man i have no clue

RKO BLACK RKO
December 12th, 2007, 04:31 PM
c yea i had that same question 2 lets try to mess aound with it

oooooo its aaaaaalllllllll the way at the bottom just scroll down past all the junk and u c 1-7 size yay i found it lol

chad0034
December 12th, 2007, 04:41 PM
o kool thanks

Angels02'
December 12th, 2007, 04:54 PM
OK I WANT EVERYBODY TO LISTEN UP

i think we all should calm down we r all hyped up and mad and freaking out because the shhow beat us 2 the punch with info and we r seeing this and is like OMG BLAH BLAH BLAH the show is good ps3 is better lol nNNNNOOOO just wait the few more days or hours whichever comes first till we get our mlb 2k8 news and everybody will b fine and go back to normal lol just wait every 1 it will come and we will b happy with what we read:thumbsup:



I think "Tribefansince1990" is saying that if you love baseball and baseball games,get a PS3 because you can get both MLB2K8 and MLB08.

NYMetros
December 12th, 2007, 05:08 PM
I'm getting a ps3 and trading in my 360 just like tribesfan said. WE ARE HARDCORE BASEBALL FANATICS GUYS! LIKE TRIBESFAN SAID, WE OWE IT TO OURSELVES TO HAVE OPTIONS!

RKO BLACK RKO
December 12th, 2007, 05:12 PM
I think "Tribefansince1990" is saying that if you love baseball and baseball games,get a PS3 because you can get both MLB2K8 and MLB08.

well im not at all discounting wat he said wat he said was all fine and dandy but all of the normal posters on here got 360's and loved mlb 2k7
and the show come out with some news and this guys comes on here spitting his sony crap got all the peeps freaking out wanna blow up there 360s for ps3s spending all that pointless money for a game that scored 2 full points lower than 2k7 last season

Major League Baseball 2K7 XBOX 360: 7.5

MLB 07 The Show PS3 : 5.5

all that screaming last year about how much better the show was gonna b better than 2k and look wat happen

chad0034
December 12th, 2007, 05:16 PM
MAN .... WHY CANT THEY JUST GIVE US SOME INFO ALREADY ... I WONDER IF THEY THINK ITS FUN TO MAKE US START TO WANT OTHER GAMES .. BECAUSE THEY WONT GIVE US A DROP OF INFO

Angels02'
December 12th, 2007, 05:22 PM
Major League Baseball 2K7 XBOX 360: 7.5

MLB 07 The Show PS3 : 5.5

all that screaming last year about how much better the show was gonna b better than 2k and look wat happen


Gamespot gave 2k7 like a 7.5 and The Show got an 8.5...I don't really care for what other people think though.I have to play a game to see if I like it or not.Not rely on some douche bags lame review.

yanksfanman319
December 12th, 2007, 05:42 PM
Honostly, I have been thinking about getting a ps3 for sometime now. The only reason I got a 360 last year was because it was lower in price and I wanted a next gen. console. I wasn't thinking about games I was actually interested in. For example, I hate halo, and im not big into FPS. There not bad, but that isn't my main interest, i like RPG's and Sports titles. I also like the whole online community, but im also not big online either. Those are two of the XBOX's big things, there online capability and they're known for there FPS. On the PS3 side, they're known for there RPG's. They also will be coming out with the same sports games as 360, so i wont be missing out on anything there. I also used to own a ps2 and i loved it. Putting all these things together it really would make more sence to me to have a ps3. So all those things, plus the fact im sucha big baseball fan, have really helped me make my decision.

RKO BLACK RKO
December 12th, 2007, 06:08 PM
Gamespot gave 2k7 like a 7.5 and The Show got an 8.5...I don't really care for what other people think though.I have to play a game to see if I like it or not.Not rely on some douche bags lame review.

me 2 review r just used 4 a prospective and info 4 me

shinraven
December 12th, 2007, 06:13 PM
why are we comparing mlb2k7 with mlb07 ??

sorry jacks, 2k7 " looks better" but mlb06 / 07 both blow away 2k7 in terms of gameplay, announcers/ overall control.

RKO BLACK RKO
December 12th, 2007, 06:16 PM
why are we comparing mlb2k7 with mlb07 ??

sorry jacks, 2k7 " looks better" but mlb06 / 07 both blow away 2k7 in terms of gameplay, announcers/ overall control.


huhuhuhuhuhuh here we go again:rolleyes:

Tribefansince1990
December 13th, 2007, 06:14 PM
bump.......

chad0034
December 13th, 2007, 06:23 PM
OKAY WHICH GAME HAS 40 MAN ROSTERS
? every1s saying 2k8 has it .. and people are saying The Show has it too .. then someone said that was just a rumor so i dk ?

ckarlic
December 14th, 2007, 01:23 PM
I'm getting a ps3 and trading in my 360 just like tribesfan said. WE ARE HARDCORE BASEBALL FANATICS GUYS! LIKE TRIBESFAN SAID, WE OWE IT TO OURSELVES TO HAVE OPTIONS!


Im not going to trade my ELite. I will try and save some cash from now until the release day of the show and pick me up a PS3. You never know there might be a sale somewhere at that time. Also my Bday is on March 3rd so I can hope to get a PS3 for my bday!!

chad0034
December 14th, 2007, 03:17 PM
in The SHOWs All star game do the players wear an ALL Star jersey or do they wear their teams jersey ?

chad0034
December 14th, 2007, 05:48 PM
and does ANYONE WANT TO JOIN A FANT BASEBALL LEAGUE ON CBSSPORTS.com

Tribefansince1990
December 15th, 2007, 01:32 AM
Im not positive but im pretty sure they wore the all star unis of orange and black last year for the show

kim kapwan
December 15th, 2007, 06:52 AM
When sony lowers the price tag on ps3.then i'll consider it an option.untill then screw it

chad0034
December 15th, 2007, 07:54 AM
yea same here .. i dont feel like wasting all my x mas money now on a ps3

Tribefansince1990
December 15th, 2007, 08:37 AM
When sony lowers the price tag on ps3.then i'll consider it an option.untill then screw it

The prices were cut, significantly but either way consoles are expensive, but if u love baseball games again your missing out if you dont get the show. 2K8 will be good too im sure but the more the better.
I dont want to get into a console war alot of people are ignorant to the fact PS3 will in the future catch up and MOST likely takeover, but owell I get it your freinds all have it and all that stuff. but i dunno im not gonna repeat myself again just read the previous first two posts on here they make sense its undeniable im done.

kim kapwan
December 15th, 2007, 09:21 AM
The prices were cut, significantly but either way consoles are expensive, but if u love baseball games again your missing out if you dont get the show. 2K8 will be good too im sure but the more the better.
I dont want to get into a console war alot of people are ignorant to the fact PS3 will in the future catch up and MOST likely takeover, but owell I get it your freinds all have it and all that stuff. but i dunno im not gonna repeat myself again just read the previous first two posts on here they make sense its undeniable im done.
oh yeah. I read your post and you praise it way to much.its online system is not so great.they promised games at release that did'ant come out.and because of ps3 i have to wait for games like GTA to come out next year.Take over?by the time ps3 gets there **** together microsoft will most likely be to far ahead.and woopy $500 now.Drops alittle bit more then will be talking.Alot of people will play the show on ps2 and still enjoy it so why bother going to ps3 right away.playing it on PS3 dosent make you any less or more a fan.If you like your system then cool.but dont Bash 360 because you support ps3

ghouse522
December 15th, 2007, 09:36 AM
No one ever complains about the 360 elite's price, and the ps3 is better than the elite imo the only thing the elite has over the ps3 is a bigger hard drive

ALLAMERICAN08
December 15th, 2007, 10:00 AM
you should call your nearest gamestop to find out. just so you don't have a melt down at the store! if you can afford to keep it and still get the PS3, i'd go that route !!!!!

Maverick
December 15th, 2007, 10:11 AM
The prices were cut, significantly but either way consoles are expensive, but if u love baseball games again your missing out if you dont get the show. 2K8 will be good too im sure but the more the better.
I dont want to get into a console war alot of people are ignorant to the fact PS3 will in the future catch up and MOST likely takeover, but owell I get it your freinds all have it and all that stuff. but i dunno im not gonna repeat myself again just read the previous first two posts on here they make sense its undeniable im done.

I just wrote about this on another thread. Personally, pound for pound on paper I am told that the PS3 can beat the 360. However, as of this second, I have yet to see a PS3 game that was better than its 360 counterpart. If memory serves me correctly the Sega Saturn was stronger than the PS...but in the end it didnt matter. Every reason the Saturn failed is why the PS3 hasnt kept up with the 360. Plus the 360 exclusive games are way better. Here is an excerpt from Wikipedia about the 5th gen of video games and why Saturn lost and PS won. When you read it you can almost insert Xbox360 in when they say PS and PS3 in when they say Saturn

...In addition, video game magazines constantly performed side-by-side hardware-specification comparisons of the systems using dubious statistics. Also, console makers routinely boasted theoretical maximum limits of each system's 3D polygon rendering without accounting for real world in-game performance.
...The Sega Saturn, although the most technically advanced console of the generation, suffered from poor marketing and comparatively limited third-party support. Sega's decision to use dual processors was roundly criticized, and some wrongly believe the second CPU was added as a "panic" response to the PlayStation's specifications.[citation needed] Regardless of their reasons for including it, only Sega's first-party developers were ever able to use the second CPU effectively. The Sega Saturn far more difficult than the PlayStation to program for, and the 3D graphics on its 3rd party games often lacked the luster of the PlayStation or Nintendo 64 (N64), a severe disadvantage at the dawn of 3D games.
Sega was also hurt by the plan to have a surprise four month early US launch of their console [1]. This head start failed for several reasons. One of the major reasons being there were few software titles ready. Also, the fact that the Sega Saturn was $100 more costly than the PlayStation pushed many potential buyers into purchasing the cheaper PlayStation.


I hope the PS3 gets better than the 360 or at least the games will get better, I will get a PS3 then. Especially if the exclusives are as good. But I cant justify getting a system thats games have inferior graphics and a weaker online community at this current time just for Metal Gear, Tekken, God of War and MLB The Show. Especially when on the 360 I can get Splinter Cell, Virtua Fighter, Conan(ok, not nearly as good as God) and MLB2k8. Remember in the end you buy the system not for its potential but for its games and what it can do for you currently. The online debate isnt even worth having XBox owns there. Now take a look at the exclusive list....here is a link

http://www.videogamesblogger.com/2007/04/06/console-exclusive-games-list-for-xbox-360-ps3-and-wii.htm

if you had to pick a group of games to pick what would you pick? In my mind it is a clear choice

Tribefansince1990
December 15th, 2007, 10:38 AM
good points, but as time goes on developers will relise and are relising right now that the PS3 is a better system to start making a game on and porting it to 360. I understand and fully agree 360 is winning for sure, and has more games and the online is alot more solid, but its not free for one.
and as time goes on PS3 should supass xbox. I dont HATE the 360 I just think its totally overrated and in reality manufactured very poorly and people suich as youselves shouldnt have to put up red rings and crap like that.
Im not coming here as a basher Im just expressing myself and trying to make people aware that If your first love of video games is baseball its a much wiser choice to have a PS3.

To support my comments on the future with porting games from PS3 to 360 its already starting, the PS3 came out later there for hasnt been able to be worked on very much, but game franchises are already turning to PS3, look up burnout paradise thats one of the first huge game series that has converted.
If you read in between the lines of the ben brinkman interview posted on here about 2K8 for PS3 you can see from his point of view how much better it is too work with PS3 and Blu Ray discs, the team achieveving 60 frames on PS3 before 360, faster loading times on the PS3.

In the end no 2 games are really going to be dramtically different but PS3 is going to have an edge on 2K8 like 360 did last year and as time goes on its going to be more like this for most games.

The price is higher yes but not in a huge way, bottom line youve heard it before and it really does make alot of sense in most cases "you get what you pay for"

Maverick
December 15th, 2007, 10:50 AM
I totally appreciate your perspective. I think that devs like Brinkman are going to make games starting with the PS3 and port to 360 cuz it easier to port up than to port down. So it will make alot of shared titles more alike. On the other hand. The exclusive games will look even better on the the 360 because they will be using its full power.

As far as paying for online, well even with the online service the 360 is cheaper. I like healthy competition. I hope PS3 games and devs keep pushing each other to make better games. We all know how things can get when there is no comp....just look at the current state of affairs with football titles, baseball titles and pro-wrestling.

kim kapwan
December 15th, 2007, 11:23 AM
good points, but as time goes on developers will relise and are relising right now that the PS3 is a better system to start making a game on and porting it to 360. I understand and fully agree 360 is winning for sure, and has more games and the online is alot more solid, but its not free for one.
and as time goes on PS3 should supass xbox. I dont HATE the 360 I just think its totally overrated and in reality manufactured very poorly and people suich as youselves shouldnt have to put up red rings and crap like that.
Im not coming here as a basher Im just expressing myself and trying to make people aware that If your first love of video games is baseball its a much wiser choice to have a PS3.

To support my comments on the future with porting games from PS3 to 360 its already starting, the PS3 came out later there for hasnt been able to be worked on very much, but game franchises are already turning to PS3, look up burnout paradise thats one of the first huge game series that has converted.
If you read in between the lines of the ben brinkman interview posted on here about 2K8 for PS3 you can see from his point of view how much better it is too work with PS3 and Blu Ray discs, the team achieveving 60 frames on PS3 before 360, faster loading times on the PS3.

In the end no 2 games are really going to be dramtically different but PS3 is going to have an edge on 2K8 like 360 did last year and as time goes on its going to be more like this for most games.

The price is higher yes but not in a huge way, bottom line youve heard it before and it really does make alot of sense in most cases "you get what you pay for"
did you say soon they will realize?lol.the reason why there are not many games like DMC and GTA because of the ps3 softrare.alot of what was sapposed to be just ps3 games are going to the 360.and the only thing i got from reading the berkmin interview is that he finds it easier working on the 360 then ps3 so your whole read inbetween the lines is nothing more then wishful thinking.How about before you praise the ps3 for the future it holds lets see what it brings us first because right now it has'ant brung much

Tribefansince1990
December 15th, 2007, 11:45 AM
did you say soon they will realize?lol.the reason why there are not many games like DMC and GTA because of the ps3 softrare.alot of what was sapposed to be just ps3 games are going to the 360.and the only thing i got from reading the berkmin interview is that he finds it easier working on the 360 then ps3 so your whole read inbetween the lines is nothing more then wishful thinking.How about before you praise the ps3 for the future it holds lets see what it brings us first because right now it has'ant brung much

thats fine im not out to start a war we can agree to disagree. I just dont feel its wishful thinking at all i had 3 valid points stated in the article. Ive read numourus times how the PS3 would take over much like ive read xbox cant be touched but look at the facts poound for pound as mentioned before PS3 is the superior machine and in the end will be the leader because of this. its Ironic because people assumed xbox 1 wouldnt do anything because of PS2 but there xbox had the edge and was the superior machine, but PS2 came out first so people were denial just like they are with the 360.
overall PS2 outsold xbox and all that but xbox ended up having hotter games in shorter period of time thats whats in store for PS3.
In the end 360 will sell more overall im sure, but the PS3 will be of higher quality in a year or two and take over in the back end of this war before PS4 and xbox 720 or whatever.

but thats it im done im not angry or anything but theres nothing else to say the points are all layed out if some people cant see what i see I guess I cant help you,

If you like sports games especially ps3 is the machine u should own but if you cant live without halo and gears of war then go for 360 but u wont have top quality games in a year or two chances are.

This is all just opinion and how I feel after owning a 360 now a PS3 and looking up reports and comparissons. agree or dont its your choice but i know what im standing behind, think about the future..

kim kapwan
December 15th, 2007, 12:48 PM
thats fine im not out to start a war we can agree to disagree. I just dont feel its wishful thinking at all i had 3 valid points stated in the article. Ive read numourus times how the PS3 would take over much like ive read xbox cant be touched but look at the facts poound for pound as mentioned before PS3 is the superior machine and in the end will be the leader because of this. its Ironic because people assumed xbox 1 wouldnt do anything because of PS2 but there xbox had the edge and was the superior machine, but PS2 came out first so people were denial just like they are with the 360.
overall PS2 outsold xbox and all that but xbox ended up having hotter games in shorter period of time thats whats in store for PS3.
In the end 360 will sell more overall im sure, but the PS3 will be of higher quality in a year or two and take over in the back end of this war before PS4 and xbox 720 or whatever.

but thats it im done im not angry or anything but theres nothing else to say the points are all layed out if some people cant see what i see I guess I cant help you,

If you like sports games especially ps3 is the machine u should own but if you cant live without halo and gears of war then go for 360 but u wont have top quality games in a year or two chances are.

This is all just opinion and how I feel after owning a 360 now a PS3 and looking up reports and comparissons. agree or dont its your choice but i know what im standing behind, think about the future..
Like i said before.lets see what the future brings us first

ksig24
December 15th, 2007, 05:40 PM
The bottom line with the PS3 is that they are utilizing the power of the machine and by using this power, they can use the Blu-Ray disk to their advantage. That is four times the space as a regular DVD.

Maverick
December 16th, 2007, 07:10 AM
The bottom line with the PS3 is that they are utilizing the power of the machine and by using this power, they can use the Blu-Ray disk to their advantage. That is four times the space as a regular DVD.
bottom line is that I am yet to see a better game or have a better online experience with the PS3 as of yet. Maybe one day it will be better. But I am still waiting for the Saturn to surpass the PS...I dont want to sound like a hater. I am actually comtemplating getting a PS3 for myself....but I am waiting for it to step up graphically...and for it to have better exclusive titles.

sleepytercel
December 16th, 2007, 09:40 AM
bottom line is that I am yet to see a better game or have a better online experience with the PS3 as of yet. Maybe one day it will be better. But I am still waiting for the Saturn to surpass the PS...I dont want to sound like a hater. I am actually comtemplating getting a PS3 for myself....but I am waiting for it to step up graphically...and for it to have better exclusive titles.

That Saturn and PS quote was not needed. Unlike the PS3, the Saturn had some of the most memorable and best games for that time. Sony's first party support for the PS3 is dismal compared to Sega's on the Saturn. If it wasn't for Sega themselves, the Saturn and Dreamcast wouldn't even get a look at. I loved my Saturn and it loved me back. I will take Parnzar Dragoon Saga and Shining Force 3 anyday. The PS had some great games as well, no denying, and I'd say the high profile games were about the same amount in both systems lifespan when they were together. The PS was flooded by some really crud games, but made the system look even better due to the amount.

Sorry about the rant, but I just had to show some support for the Saturn. However, a lot of Sony's current business tactics and practices are very close to how Sega managed the Saturn. Even the current PS3 commercial is very close to Sega's old Saturn commercial where they are trying to force the consumer about how great the product is.

tmoneymill
December 16th, 2007, 10:40 AM
When sony lowers the price tag on ps3.then i'll consider it an option.untill then screw it


When sony lowers the price???? do you guys realize that the ps3 is actually a bargain to the consumer??? your really only paying about $150 bucks for the ps3 due to the fact the cheapest blu ray player you can get is now $250. You can say you dont want to but a blu ray player that plays games. Well your not, your actually getting a video game system that you can watch HD movies on. You cant beat that. Also, if you really want to do a money comparision between what comes included with a ps3 and what youd have to buy in order to match that with the 360, the ps3 is by far the bargain.

PS3 outta box is like this, $399. Included, wifi internet access, free internet, blu ray player included(but when ps3 came out and for a long time the cheapest blu-ray was from 500-1000). ok then you do have to buy hd cables, so either an hdmi or component cables, you can get cheap hdmi's for 10 bucks and they work just as good as the 100 dollar ones. so a total of about 430 after tax.

NOW, in order for the 360 to match that heres what they would have to do. $450, elite. now, you gotta get a wireless adapter. microsofts cost 100 bucks, up to $550 now, then you gotta buy and hd-dvd add on, 150-200 bucks. now were are up to 700-750. THEN if your gonna wanna get online to play this game vs people, you gotta pay 50 for the good package. uh oh now were up to 750-800. THEN if you already owned a 360 and wanted the elite, now your paying twice as much just to upgrade the system you already have?????? does that make any sense????


NOW, for the clown who said ps3 hasnt matched the 360 in terms of graphics, what are you smoking brother, cuz i want some. If you think gears of wars has the best graphics, which right now thats the best graphically looking game on 360. GO AND PLAY UNREAL TOURNAMENT III for the ps3. Makers of gears and from the developers mouth, this game is head and shoulders above what gears was, both graphically and online gameplay. WHy do you do a lil research. Then COD4, how do you think thats better on the 360, they are exactly the same, exactly. Then you wanna talk exclusives?????

You have bioshock, mass effect, HALO 3(MOST OVERRATED VIDEO GAME OF ALL TIME), GEars of WArs and then???????????

Now on ps3...WARHAWK(16 on 16 madness, both in the air and on the ground, better game than HALO 3 in my opinion, got very bored with HAlo 3). Moving right along, RFOM, great exclusive. NEXT, UNCHARTED DRAKES FORTUNE, one of the best looking games on either platform you will EVER play. NExt, Heavenly sword..very comparable to god of war in terms of gameplay. NOW, Unreal TOURNAMENT III, the best graphically looking game on the market as of right now. THen in the next few month, HAZE, KILLZONE 2, both HALO killers, which its a travesty i have to use that term. Then you got METAL GEAR SOLID which WILL be the game of the year.

IN conclusion, the whole ps3 doesnt have any games and is to much is getting to be a thing of the past. Either you have no clue what your talking about or you just got your 360 up your butt. Yes the online services are different right now, in terms of what they have to offer. But in terms of being able to play online games, THEY ARE EXACTLY THE SAME. i can put in mlb 2k7, click on online, go to the lobby and get a game. JUST LIKE YOU ON THE 360. so the gaming experience is the same, the services offered are different. BUT when HOME comes out in 08, youll be seeing alot of those differences dissapear. And the guy who said that they started porting from the ps3 to the 360 is right. Every multiplatform game up until now has all been made from the ground up on the 360 and ported to the ps3, making a lil weaker on the ps3. But if you look at the games made from the ground up on the ps3 you WILL notice a huge difference in terms of graphics and less of bugs. And now they are porting from the ps3 to the 360, sooooo take it for what its worth. SONY's Reputation in the gamin world is something that shouldnt be overlooked. Yes, buying a ps3 at launch was a huge gamble, but buying one now is the smart choice.

Tribefansince1990
December 16th, 2007, 10:52 AM
I know at first PS3 struggled for online connectivity but now it seems to be working well for me at least.

as for the blu ray HD DVD thing I love how the 360 sells theres for $199 serperatley and THEN u have to buy HDMI cables on top of that if u dont have an Elite. I have a good freind who got caught in this situation. Hes making the smarter choice of convering to PS3.
Chances are consumers wont put with HD DVD and Blu Ray wars. Movies are very very very common as opposed to video games the market wont put up with it there will become a universal HD disc that can play on both players most likely. its already being considered

tmoneymill
December 16th, 2007, 11:04 AM
i dont agree with you on the universal hd disc. and if it does come out like that it wont be a for a long time. Blu-ray is winning the war and more studios are going with blu-ray discs. hd-dvd's wont be obsolete but they will be few and far between.

Tribefansince1990
December 16th, 2007, 11:06 AM
yeah thats the way its leaning for now I hope if anything Blu Ray does win anyways I cant wait I just found out the other day 30 days of night is going to be on blu ray im syked!

tmoneymill
December 16th, 2007, 11:13 AM
they just locked up another studio for exclusives, i forget which one.

Blu-ray list:New Line Cinema, Sony Pictures, Walt Disney, Warner Bros. and Twentieth Century Fox

Hd-dvd list:New Line Cinema, Paramount Pictures, Universal Pictures and Warner Bros.


so it looks like blu-ray gets SONY, Disney and Fox while hd-dvd get paramount and universal. but theres no denying that the ps3 is helping push the blu-ray disc war, just like they did when they allowed dvd's to be played on ps2. Similiar situation.

Maverick
December 16th, 2007, 01:10 PM
That Saturn and PS quote was not needed. Unlike the PS3, the Saturn had some of the most memorable and best games for that time. Sony's first party support for the PS3 is dismal compared to Sega's on the Saturn. If it wasn't for Sega themselves, the Saturn and Dreamcast wouldn't even get a look at. I loved my Saturn and it loved me back. I will take Parnzar Dragoon Saga and Shining Force 3 anyday. The PS had some great games as well, no denying, and I'd say the high profile games were about the same amount in both systems lifespan when they were together. The PS was flooded by some really crud games, but made the system look even better due to the amount.

Sorry about the rant, but I just had to show some support for the Saturn. However, a lot of Sony's current business tactics and practices are very close to how Sega managed the Saturn. Even the current PS3 commercial is very close to Sega's old Saturn commercial where they are trying to force the consumer about how great the product is.

Dont get me wrong...I loved Sega...I got the sega, sega Saturn and Dreamcast. I think they had awsome games. But you have to admit that the PS3 and the Saturn are being handled by there respective companies in a similar way. A way that led to the demise of the Saturn. What I wrote on the Saturn was not to knock it...nor to knock the PS3. I was merely just looking at the past to give insight into the future

sleepytercel
December 16th, 2007, 01:21 PM
Dont get me wrong...I loved Sega...I got the sega, sega Saturn and Dreamcast. I think they had awsome games. But you have to admit that the PS3 and the Saturn are being handled by there respective companies in a similar way. A way that led to the demise of the Saturn. What I wrote on the Saturn was not to knock it...nor to knock the PS3. I was merely just looking at the past to give insight into the future

My second paragraph states what you just said, so technically, I already admitted that ;) It's funny, but it's extremely close to how Sega handled the Saturn. What's even more interesting is how Sony is fighting themselves between the American side and their Japanese side, which is exactly what happened to Sega during the Saturn era.

Tmoney, your information is nothing but hope and speculation. Just because a game is built with PS3 architecture, that doesn't mean less bugs. That carries no logic. Believe what you want, but Sony is struggling hard right now. They are desperately trying to push the PS3 because it is hurting them. Game developers aren't just going to start porting games from the PS3 to the 360 when the games on PS3 are not selling that well. Also, because of the PS3's difficulty in programming, it's more cost and time effective to program for the 360. This was also a similar issue with the PSOne and Sega Saturn that caused many games going to the PSOne. The Saturn was proved difficult to work with and game ports were actually worse on the Saturn even though it was a more powerful machine. On the PS3, many game ports are looking worse due to the same issues.

tmoneymill
December 16th, 2007, 01:26 PM
My second paragraph states what you just said, so technically, I already admitted that ;) It's funny, but it's extremely close to how Sega handled the Saturn. What's even more interesting is how Sony is fighting themselves between the American side and their Japanese side, which is exactly what happened to Sega during the Saturn era.

Tmoney, your information is nothing but hope and speculation. Just because a game is built with PS3 architecture, that doesn't mean less bugs. That carries no logic. Believe what you want, but Sony is struggling hard right now. They are desperately trying to push the PS3 because it is hurting them. Game developers aren't just going to start porting games from the PS3 to the 360 when the games on PS3 are not selling that well. Also, because of the PS3's difficulty in programming, it's more cost and time effective to program for the 360. This was also a similar issue with the PSOne and Sega Saturn that caused many games going to the PSOne. The Saturn was proved difficult to work with and game ports were actually worse on the Saturn even though it was a more powerful machine. On the PS3, many game ports are looking worse due to the same issues.


its not hope and speculation, its the truth. Yes, if it is built from the ground up on the ps3 instead of being ported. there are fewer bugs and glitches in them. porting games hurts whatever system the game is being ported too. Its a fact. And yes they are going to start porting games from the ps3 to the 360. The Ps3 gives the developers more room to work with and more opportunities. the only reason 360 has been getting extra content is because M$ is paying these companies more money just to get the extra content, ie GTAIV.

ALSO, it was the first time any of these developers have even worked with the ps3. Even brinkman said in his interview that now that they have had more time to see what the ps3 can do, the product will much much better. the proof is in the pudding. Look at COD4, it wasnt a port, they made them on both systems from the ground up and COD4 is one of the best games on the market regardless of system. SONY isnt holding anyone back, its the laziness on game developers to work on something, IE ea sports. Madden is a disgrace to football on next-gen. EA has gone backwards when it comes to next gen games, regardless of systems. So no, its not hope and speculation.

Maverick
December 16th, 2007, 01:30 PM
@tmoneymill.

Dude the games I have seen side by side...have ALL looked better on the 360. As far as the exclusives....well that is just a matter of preference. As far as Gears having the best graphics, I dont remember saying that. In truth I am not a big Gears fan (although I do like the game).Btw..i believe Drakes Fortune is for both systems...even if its not...its just a Tomb Raider knock off. I am not into Gods of War style games. In that genre I would have to tip my hat to PS3. We wont even debate online play...to even compare the 2 systems is laughable. I prefer what they have to offer on the 360. The exclusives you mentioned are not games I am even remotely interested in it is a matter of preference. But besides the Gods of War style game I dont see a genre that PS3 is better in. Now you mentioned COD4 I have seen it on both systems imo looks better on the 360. But lets say that it isnt...go play that or any game online...NOW WHICH GAME IS BETTER. Also Unreal tshould look better than Gears it was made after what almost 2 years after...I will bet money that gear II will look better than unreal...but we will have to wait and see on that.

Now you mentioned Haze and Killzone as Halo killers...well that is yet to be seen (and at best it is just a matter of preference). They maybe only able to keep up with Timeshift...but tell me the Mass Effect killer, or the Bioshock killer, or the Ace Combat killer shall i keep going. PS3 has nothing even close to those games. You guys have Gods of War, admittedly 360 has done some bad knock off of that game (Bewulf, Conan). You also have Metal Gear...i think the closest we come might be Splinter Cell.

Alot of it is preference...and listen when the PS3 gets some better exclusives I willl totally buy it and get games for it. Its not like Microsoft is paying my mortgage or anything. IMO i just think that until the 360 steps up it is a close second the the 360...but int he end i like the competition. it makes both products better

tmoneymill
December 16th, 2007, 01:45 PM
@tmoneymill.

Dude the games I have seen side by side...have ALL looked better on the 360. As far as the exclusives....well that is just a matter of preference. As far as Gears having the best graphics, I dont remember saying that. In truth I am not a big Gears fan (although I do like the game).Btw..i believe Drakes Fortune is for both systems...even if its not...its just a Tomb Raider knock off. I am not into Gods of War style games. In that genre I would have to tip my hat to PS3. We wont even debate online play...to even compare the 2 systems is laughable. I prefer what they have to offer on the 360. The exclusives you mentioned are not games I am even remotely interested in it is a matter of preference. But besides the Gods of War style game I dont see a genre that PS3 is better in. Now you mentioned COD4 I have seen it on both systems imo looks better on the 360. But lets say that it isnt...go play that or any game online...NOW WHICH GAME IS BETTER. Also Unreal tshould look better than Gears it was made after what almost 2 years after...I will bet money that gear II will look better than unreal...but we will have to wait and see on that.

Now you mentioned Haze and Killzone as Halo killers...well that is yet to be seen (and at best it is just a matter of preference). They maybe only able to keep up with Timeshift...but tell me the Mass Effect killer, or the Bioshock killer, or the Ace Combat killer shall i keep going. PS3 has nothing even close to those games. You guys have Gods of War, admittedly 360 has done some bad knock off of that game (Bewulf, Conan). You also have Metal Gear...i think the closest we come might be Splinter Cell.

Alot of it is preference...and listen when the PS3 gets some better exclusives I willl totally buy it and get games for it. Its not like Microsoft is paying my mortgage or anything. IMO i just think that until the 360 steps up it is a close second the the 360...but int he end i like the competition. it makes both products better

"Btw..i believe Drakes Fortune is for both systems...even if its not...its just a Tomb Raider knock off."
Wrong, drakes fortune is ps3 exclusive and if you think its a tomb raider knock off then youve never played it. Its head and shoulders about what that game is.

YOu act like ps online isnt playable....are you serious. the only thing xbl has is what it offers inside the xbl. not the gameplay. Now, my buddy has a 360 and ps3, got cod4 for 360 and i got it for ps3. i took the game to his house and we did screen by screen comparisions. we went to the same place in the game and then switched between the two. THEY ARE EXACTLY THE SAME.

And you do know CONAN is on the ps3 right???? SO What type of games are you interested in then??? you dont like shooters, you dont like adventure games.

And 360 doesnt have any game comparable to rathcet and clank either.

AND IF YOUR HONESTLY COMPARING A SPLINTER CELL GAME TO METAL GEAR SOLID, then you have NEVER played any metal gear solid. THAT MY FRIEND is laughable.

tmoneymill
December 16th, 2007, 01:47 PM
also, looks like bioshock might be coming to the ps3.

http://www.psu.com/BioShock-for-the-PS3-Confirmed,-Yet-Again-News--a1012-p0.php

YOU DO KNOW TIMESHIFT IS ALSO FOR THE PS3 too??????? im starting believe your clueless in this whole matter.

kim kapwan
December 16th, 2007, 01:51 PM
its not hope and speculation, its the truth. Yes, if it is built from the ground up on the ps3 instead of being ported. there are fewer bugs and glitches in them. porting games hurts whatever system the game is being ported too. Its a fact. And yes they are going to start porting games from the ps3 to the 360. The Ps3 gives the developers more room to work with and more opportunities. the only reason 360 has been getting extra content is because M$ is paying these companies more money just to get the extra content, ie GTAIV.

ALSO, it was the first time any of these developers have even worked with the ps3. Even brinkman said in his interview that now that they have had more time to see what the ps3 can do, the product will much much better. the proof is in the pudding. Look at COD4, it wasnt a port, they made them on both systems from the ground up and COD4 is one of the best games on the market regardless of system. SONY isnt holding anyone back, its the laziness on game developers to work on something, IE ea sports. Madden is a disgrace to football on next-gen. EA has gone backwards when it comes to next gen games, regardless of systems. So no, its not hope and speculation.
im not sure about the ground up thing.I've played Virtual fighter 5 at my uncles house on ps3 and I think its better on 360.its more easy for developers to work on 360 games then ps3 games because of the ps3's make up which in thus pushes back the release date of games hurting it somewhat.Graphic wise its not even up to Debate. The Xenos GPU on the XBOX 360 is superior the RSX on the PS3.so Graphics wise 360 takes the cake.As far as the games go.its up to debate.thing is microsoft has a good lead over them in variety.Im expecting sony to step there game up even furthure in 08 but microsoft will most likely do the same so.Unless ps3 just Dominates 08 i dont see it really pulling ahead.but should'ant we all just enjoy the splender of all next gen?because we can go back and fourth
about this all day while the wii slowly but surely creeps up and takes the number 1 spot

tmoneymill
December 16th, 2007, 01:57 PM
WII AINT ****, its a ***in gimmick. so dont even try to bring that into the next-gen category. sorry. I dont give a **** what graphic card the 360 uses compared to ps3, it depends on what the developers can do with it. THE unreal engine is was used for gears of war. something that was developed on sony by epic. So it will run nicer and smoother on ps3.

The virtual fighter comment is laughable as well. AS of right now it should look better on 360, they ported it from there to the ps3. graphics take a hit when being ported.

please read this, "The Xbox 360 port has benefited from the additions and refinements that have been made to the Version C arcade revision, while the PlayStation 3 port is based around the older Version B. revision." wikapedia... once again, lazy development hurts sony. NOT THE PS3, lazy developers. Stop blaming the ps3 when developers are too lazy to want to figure it out. LOOK AT THE EXCLUSIVES FOR PS3, if you havent played them then you cant talk anything about them. Uncharted is not another tomb raider, sorry.

sleepytercel
December 16th, 2007, 02:09 PM
The virtual fighter comment is laughable as well. AS of right now it should look better on 360, they ported it from there to the ps3. graphics take a hit when being ported.

please read this, "The Xbox 360 port has benefited from the additions and refinements that have been made to the Version C arcade revision, while the PlayStation 3 port is based around the older Version B. revision." wikapedia... once again, lazy development hurts sony. NOT THE PS3, lazy developers. Stop blaming the ps3 when developers are too lazy to want to figure it out. LOOK AT THE EXCLUSIVES FOR PS3, if you havent played them then you cant talk anything about them. Uncharted is not another tomb raider, sorry.

Okay, we got it, you're a PS3 fan. Even though your logic lacks sense, you disregard many of the 360 exclusives and pass them off as nothing, constantly contradict yourself, and base your facts on obvious opinion, we do know you're a fan of the PS3. You've accomplished whatever goal it is you were seeking. However, let people enjoy the purchase they have made and allow them to have their own opinion.

Almost everything you say about the PS3 can be countered by someone else about the 360. If you think developers are just going to jump to PS3 development, you have no business sense at all. Most game developers are barely even making money, and spending even more money and time to gather rescources for a system that hasn't proved a great install base and is completely difficult to program for, isn't a great business tactic.

Also, your VF comment doesn't make any sense. VF5 was not ported from the 360 (unless you just typed that out wrong). VF5 was not caused by any lazy development. Sega and many arcade developers upgrade their hardware units all the time and the 360 version of VF5 recieved the latest unit upgrade. It probably didn't exist when the PS3 version was released. Regardless, both versions look great.

kim kapwan
December 16th, 2007, 02:11 PM
WII AINT ****, its a ***in gimmick. so dont even try to bring that into the next-gen category. sorry. I dont give a **** what graphic card the 360 uses compared to ps3, it depends on what the developers can do with it. THE unreal engine is was used for gears of war. something that was developed on sony by epic. So it will run nicer and smoother on ps3.

The virtual fighter comment is laughable as well. AS of right now it should look better on 360, they ported it from there to the ps3. graphics take a hit when being ported.

please read this, "The Xbox 360 port has benefited from the additions and refinements that have been made to the Version C arcade revision, while the PlayStation 3 port is based around the older Version B. revision." wikapedia... once again, lazy development hurts sony. NOT THE PS3, lazy developers. Stop blaming the ps3 when developers are too lazy to want to figure it out. LOOK AT THE EXCLUSIVES FOR PS3, if you havent played them then you cant talk anything about them. Uncharted is not another tomb raider, sorry.
Dude.get a F***** grip.how far do you have ps3 up your rectum?All next gen graphics are considerd better then there predisecors.and the VF i dont follow you because vitual fighters was Originally made first on ps3 so i dont know what your saying..and who the heck brung up uncharted and tomb raider?you need to take a chill pill and stop multi arguing with people.and as far as the wii goes.its fun to play.are its graphics as good as ps3.nope.but i deffintly get more fun out of those games then any ps3 game i can think of.my Oppion.not a fact

tmoneymill
December 16th, 2007, 02:16 PM
what i posted was not from my mouth. it was a quote.

Also, im not saying the 360 is bad, youll never find a comment from me that says the 360 is bad. look for it, you wont find it. Im just sticking up for the ps3 for people who are clueless and say there are lack of games and its too expensive. And actually making games on dvd is holding the video game industry back. More and more developers are falling in love with the ps3 and what they can do with it and the space on a blu-ray disc.

thats the truth, not just from my mouth, not just pulling out of the air. Look at how many "good" exclusives the 360 has. he named about 7, thats in 2 years of 360 being around. PS3 is getting good exclusives, Gran turismo 5, Killzone 2, HAZE, Unreal Tournament III, RFOM, MLB The show, Heavenly sword, WARHAWK, Ratchet and Clank, Uncharted. The ps3 is coming on fast. Im just saying that people who are trying to say the ps3 doenst have any exclusives worth playin havent played any of them.

tmoneymill
December 16th, 2007, 02:19 PM
Please read mavericks post about uncharted being like tomb raider. stop selective reading.
I didnt say that about Virtual fighter, it was stated on the web.

The wii is not next gen, it isnt. Ps3 will utilize the sixaxxis and it will basically be like the wii. its just motion sensoring gaming. yea, they are fun to play, but for how long and can you have fun playing them by yourself or at a party. I agree it is a great party system, but thats about it.

kim kapwan
December 16th, 2007, 02:44 PM
what i posted was not from my mouth. it was a quote.

Also, im not saying the 360 is bad, youll never find a comment from me that says the 360 is bad. look for it, you wont find it. Im just sticking up for the ps3 for people who are clueless and say there are lack of games and its too expensive. And actually making games on dvd is holding the video game industry back. More and more developers are falling in love with the ps3 and what they can do with it and the space on a blu-ray disc.

thats the truth, not just from my mouth, not just pulling out of the air. Look at how many "good" exclusives the 360 has. he named about 7, thats in 2 years of 360 being around. PS3 is getting good exclusives, Gran turismo 5, Killzone 2, HAZE, Unreal Tournament III, RFOM, MLB The show, Heavenly sword, WARHAWK, Ratchet and Clank, Uncharted. The ps3 is coming on fast. Im just saying that people who are trying to say the ps3 doenst have any exclusives worth playin havent played any of them.
im sorry.are you not the one that said 360 has nothing that matches up to Ratchet and clank and said halo 3 was overrated ect......?Sticking up for the ps3?thanks but its not needed.I think the guy who Origianlly was a work in itself .its one thing to say get a ps3 to have more options.its another to pretty much sit there and say its way better then 360 in a snobbish manner saying stuff like its the future and im glad i made the right choice.not saying that you said it but its already been said.if the ps3 is so great then it will promote itself.we dont need threads saying you should get one blah blah blah.also dont need the play by play on any love affairs you think developers are having.nor dose it mean they Automaticly choose ps3 over 360.as far as the uncharted tomb raider goes.Tomb raider Has a better story but uncharted is just a better game then any tomb raider thats out.there are games that you can enjoy by yourself. zelda,MG,for examples.those nintendo charcters keep nintendo aflot more then you think.and SSB brawl is gonna get a ***load of playing time next year compared to what else might drop next year.also dont underestimate the wii because people said its graphics could'ant be as strong as xbox.and then Re4 drops and shows what there really capable of Graphic wise

tmoneymill
December 16th, 2007, 02:49 PM
I DIDNT MAKE THIS THREAD. are you comparing re4 on the wii to that of the graphics of re4 on ps3 and 360?????

And yes, Halo 3 is overrated. Anyone that has played COD4 then went back to halo 3 would notice huge differences. Halo 3 is the most hyped up game in the history of gaming. but is it really that good???? is it?? when its online capacity is only 8 on 8 on a next gen system??? socom for ps2 even has 16 on 16. thats not next gen online gaming to me. sorry

kim kapwan
December 16th, 2007, 02:57 PM
I DIDNT MAKE THIS THREAD. are you comparing re4 on the wii to that of the graphics of re4 on ps3 and 360?????

And yes, Halo 3 is overrated. Anyone that has played COD4 then went back to halo 3 would notice huge differences. Halo 3 is the most hyped up game in the history of gaming. but is it really that good???? is it?? when its online capacity is only 8 on 8 on a next gen system??? socom for ps2 even has 16 on 16. thats not next gen online gaming to me. sorry
yeah sorry about that.i meant the GC version of RE4 compared to xbox 1 graphics.far as halo 3 goes.Yeah i would say its a tad overrated.but that dosent change the fact that its a good game just because you personally dont like it.and just because you have a personal view of whats considerd next gen dosent mean there fact

tmoneymill
December 16th, 2007, 03:17 PM
you can compare games on ps2(later games) to that of reg xbox and have an argument that the ps2 could match what xbox was doing graphically as well. it just seems to me that sony and the developers that buy into it, can produce incredible games. halo 3 is a good game but 360 owners all bought their 360 for THAT game basically, and waited nearly 2 years for it. And by the time it came out, there were games out for 360 that had already passed it by in terms of grapics and gameplay. thats why i say its overrated.

chitown1211
December 17th, 2007, 10:37 AM
I love these threads.


Its amazing how many of you will spend $500 and take a hit on your 360 for more " promises of the future". lol


Good luck fellas.