View Full Version : Decisions, Decisions...
BJaysFan01
December 14th, 2007, 05:12 PM
I currently have a PS2(i konw it is PATHETIC) and i played a lot last year online(124-81 record) and this year for Christmas I', either getting a PS3 or a XBOX 360. I need help with which one to get, i only really play sports games so no Halo or shooting games so does that mean i should get a PS3? im not going to get a 360 just cuz everyone else has one! on average how many people are usually online during baseball season for PS3 and XBOX360? Any help would be much appreciated! THX!
chad0034
December 14th, 2007, 05:45 PM
yea id say get a PS3... because of the sports ... unless football is ur fav then go w/ XBOX 360 because Madden's always had better ratings on the 360 .. i regret getting one because my fav sport is baseball by far
yanksfanman319
December 14th, 2007, 05:57 PM
yeah def. get a PS3. I regret getting my 360 because I mainly play RPG's and Sports games (Baseball being my favorite.) I am also getting a ps3 for Christmas!
chad0034
December 14th, 2007, 06:22 PM
i cant afford a PS3 rite now so if i really dont like what i see w/ mlb 2k8 ill trade my 360 in plus a bunch of games ... and add like 150 dollars of my own and get a ps3 and a couple games .. but if 2k8 looks good ill keep my 360 and get 2k8 ... i wish theyd give us some detail too like the show did
UDFAN4LIF3
December 14th, 2007, 08:27 PM
LOL get a 360, ps3's online is garbage and lags way to much. 360's is nice and smooth. MLB2k7 was laggy offline for the ps3 LMAO. I had a ps3 and sold it because it is a absolute joke. Graphics are only better on the ps3 if you have a 1080P HDTV. IF you have 1080i it looks the excat same. Trust me dont go with the ps3. 360 is the now. ps3 is the never.
Bl00d h0und Gang
December 14th, 2007, 11:35 PM
Well I play sports games exclusively. OK a little CoD 4, but for the past 15 years 95% of my gaming has been with sports titles. When Madden went online back in 2002 I became a gaming junkie. My brother, who works for Sony Entertainment as a programmer, bought me an XBOX 360. He feels that Microsoft provides a superior gaming experience with their online reliability. PS3 is a more powerful system; however, it lacks an online community. The amount of users playing online with common games is 2 to 1 in favor of the 360. Take All Pro Football for instance, you would have to wait over 30 mins at times just to find an opponent to play. Ask yourself what you want: The more dazzling system? or the better online community?
Tribefansince1990
December 15th, 2007, 01:30 AM
PS3 if you're a sports guy garunteed no questions asked. If u like Halo and Gears of war and games like that then 360
Maverick
December 15th, 2007, 09:50 AM
overall the games on the 360 are better when the same games are put side by side next to each other(Assasins Creed, Rockband, NBA2K8, Virtua fighter, SVR2008, Call of Duty, Madden, etc.) I personally think that the xbox exclusive games are far better, plus alot of PS exclusives often make there way over to the xbox. I am willing to be that eventually Meal Gear will be on the 360 just like Virtua Fighter and Devil May Cry has crossed over. I cant even think of another PS exclusive that doesnt have a similar 360 title that is comprable or better besides Metal Gear Solid. Games like Tekken wont crossover, but otherwise the other important exclusive is God of War. I am sure games and franchises like Halo, Gears of War, Mass Effect, Bioshock, DOA, Dead Rising, Ace Combat, Splinter Cell, Lost Planet etc. wont cross over from the 360 to the PS. All those titles do not have a truly similar game on PS and if they do they are far inferior.
When it comes to just the sports genre all the major sports except baseball have the same titles for both systems and in every case the 360 version is better. However, as far as baseball goes....PS3 is the better way to go just because you will have options. However, if MLB2k is better than the show this year....well you will be making the wrong pick by getting the PS3.
On the other hand as far as online community....there is no comparison xbox360 is far superior. The ability to download demos can get you into games that you may have not gotten into otherwise and can help you avoid purchasing games you might not be into. For example....there was alot of hype around bioshock....i would have gotten it, until i played the demo and realized i was not into it at all. On the other hand I would never have gotten my 2 fav games if i didnt play the demo (ace combat and guitar hero).
Overall the gaming and entertainment experience of the 360 is light years ahead... ok maybe just a few miles ahead. However, if you want to play it safe from strictly a baseball gamers point of view go with PS3. In truth, if the hitting system for 2K isnt changed there is a decent chance i might by a PS3 for the Show. I am a big baseball fan. But who is to say that The Show will be good...what if it sucks? I would never buy a system for just one title personally. But I like different kinds of games. The main games I am playing now are (Ace Combat, VF5, Rockband, and NBA2k8) so i need to take alot into consideration.
Basically the only way I would get a PS3 is if I was hardcore Tekken, Metal Gear Solid fan and I loved baseball games and really didnt like MLB2K7...and didnt care about any other aspects of gaming all that much. Good luck.
I would say wait until the baseball games both come out and wait for the reveiew...but, this has probably been the best 6 months as far as quality games in the history of gaming. You shouldn miss out. I mean there has never been a time period in gaming that was flooded with so many quality titles. Even games like Timeshift that has seems middle of the road now 1-2 years ago would have been one of the top games...now its just another game because the quality is so high. Sorry for the long post.
Maverick
December 15th, 2007, 09:59 AM
Well I play sports games exclusively. OK a little CoD 4, but for the past 15 years 95% of my gaming has been with sports titles. When Madden went online back in 2002 I became a gaming junkie. My brother, who works for Sony Entertainment as a programmer, bought me an XBOX 360. He feels that Microsoft provides a superior gaming experience with their online reliability. PS3 is a more powerful system; however, it lacks an online community. The amount of users playing online with common games is 2 to 1 in favor of the 360. Take All Pro Football for instance, you would have to wait over 30 mins at times just to find an opponent to play. Ask yourself what you want: The more dazzling system? or the better online community?
I am not a tech guy...but i personally would not describe the PS3 as the more dazzling system. I am told that technically it has the ability to outshine the 360, however, I have yet to see the PS game that I look at and say that it plays or looks better than the its 360 counterpart. I am yet to see a game on the PS that I look at and say...man I dont think the 360 could look this good. Play Assassin Creed, Mass Effect or Ace Combat and you will surely say....wow, i dont think the PS can compete with this. It isnt lightyears ahead as i joked about before, but there is a difference. If the PS3 is capable of running better games...it is yet to do it...or I have yet to see it.
JJ492
December 15th, 2007, 01:39 PM
PS3 Because of the variety of sports games
kim kapwan
December 15th, 2007, 01:50 PM
360.Better online community and 2k8 will most likely run smoother on 360 then ps3
Maverick
December 16th, 2007, 12:31 AM
PS3 Because of the variety of sports games
variety of sports games? the ONLY extra sport game I know of is the Show. Otherwise they have the same games except the 360 has better graphics on their sports games.
mgb
December 16th, 2007, 09:57 AM
You should get a Wii then you get to act as if you are in the game. No but seriously get 360 its more reliable online is crystal clear and graphics are much better on it. The 360 also allows you to rent movies in the marketplace. Also their the fact that you ca get a game in seconds when you go online.
ghouse522
December 16th, 2007, 10:11 AM
If you are talking about just sports games, you might as well get a ps3. Now if you might get in to FPS you might want to get into the 360.
Tribefansince1990
December 16th, 2007, 11:02 AM
360.Better online community and 2k8 will most likely run smoother on 360 then ps3
I dont mean to pick on you here but no IF ANYTHING 2k8 this year will play better on PS3 read the article, but most likely they will be equal anyways but if anyones going to have an edge its ps3 its plain to see in the brinkman 7 page interview.
as for the comment about variety of sports games theres The show wich is a must for any baseball fan so most of us on here hence my ps3 rant and then theres nba 08 which is garbage ill be honest. but at least its there if it improves and most importantly Grand turismo 5 if u consider racing a sport. when that drops its going to be huge. but that wont be for another year. but u can get the prologue soon but meh
we also get smaller games alot of the time like power pros backyard baseball etc.. nintendo usually has them as well
JJ492
December 16th, 2007, 11:20 AM
variety of sports games? the ONLY extra sport game I know of is the Show. Otherwise they have the same games except the 360 has better graphics on their sports games.
I meant to say baseball games. I have both systems and play my 360 much more because of the online but if you are strickly a sports gamer get a ps3
kim kapwan
December 16th, 2007, 11:34 AM
I dont mean to pick on you here but no IF ANYTHING 2k8 this year will play better on PS3 read the article, but most likely they will be equal anyways but if anyones going to have an edge its ps3 its plain to see in the brinkman 7 page interview.
as for the comment about variety of sports games theres The show wich is a must for any baseball fan so most of us on here hence my ps3 rant and then theres nba 08 which is garbage ill be honest. but at least its there if it improves and most importantly Grand turismo 5 if u consider racing a sport. when that drops its going to be huge. but that wont be for another year. but u can get the prologue soon but meh
we also get smaller games alot of the time like power pros backyard baseball etc.. nintendo usually has them as well
interesting article
http://www.hardcoreware.net/playstation-3-vs-xbox-360-one-year-later/
Tribefansince1990
December 16th, 2007, 11:45 AM
Im not going to read that cuz i can already assume whats its saying, and yes xbox is winning the war for sure but like i said before the future is alot different and all these sports tittles will be ported to 360 from PS3 much like 2K8 and Burnout will be it doesnt matter though like we said time will tell anyways.
kim kapwan
December 16th, 2007, 11:52 AM
Im not going to read that cuz i can already assume whats its saying, and yes xbox is winning the war for sure but like i said before the future is alot different and all these sports tittles will be ported to 360 from PS3 much like 2K8 and Burnout will be it doesnt matter though like we said time will tell anyways.
And once again you assume.its in an article that compares and contrass the 2 not judge which one is better.but like i was saying time will yeah well you know the rest
tmoneymill
December 16th, 2007, 12:13 PM
overall the games on the 360 are better when the same games are put side by side next to each other(Assasins Creed, Rockband, NBA2K8, Virtua fighter, SVR2008, Call of Duty, Madden, etc.) I personally think that the xbox exclusive games are far better, plus alot of PS exclusives often make there way over to the xbox. I am willing to be that eventually Meal Gear will be on the 360 just like Virtua Fighter and Devil May Cry has crossed over. I cant even think of another PS exclusive that doesnt have a similar 360 title that is comprable or better besides Metal Gear Solid. Games like Tekken wont crossover, but otherwise the other important exclusive is God of War. I am sure games and franchises like Halo, Gears of War, Mass Effect, Bioshock, DOA, Dead Rising, Ace Combat, Splinter Cell, Lost Planet etc. wont cross over from the 360 to the PS. All those titles do not have a truly similar game on PS and if they do they are far inferior.
When it comes to just the sports genre all the major sports except baseball have the same titles for both systems and in every case the 360 version is better. However, as far as baseball goes....PS3 is the better way to go just because you will have options. However, if MLB2k is better than the show this year....well you will be making the wrong pick by getting the PS3.
On the other hand as far as online community....there is no comparison xbox360 is far superior. The ability to download demos can get you into games that you may have not gotten into otherwise and can help you avoid purchasing games you might not be into. For example....there was alot of hype around bioshock....i would have gotten it, until i played the demo and realized i was not into it at all. On the other hand I would never have gotten my 2 fav games if i didnt play the demo (ace combat and guitar hero).
Overall the gaming and entertainment experience of the 360 is light years ahead... ok maybe just a few miles ahead. However, if you want to play it safe from strictly a baseball gamers point of view go with PS3. In truth, if the hitting system for 2K isnt changed there is a decent chance i might by a PS3 for the Show. I am a big baseball fan. But who is to say that The Show will be good...what if it sucks? I would never buy a system for just one title personally. But I like different kinds of games. The main games I am playing now are (Ace Combat, VF5, Rockband, and NBA2k8) so i need to take alot into consideration.
Basically the only way I would get a PS3 is if I was hardcore Tekken, Metal Gear Solid fan and I loved baseball games and really didnt like MLB2K7...and didnt care about any other aspects of gaming all that much. Good luck.
I would say wait until the baseball games both come out and wait for the reveiew...but, this has probably been the best 6 months as far as quality games in the history of gaming. You shouldn miss out. I mean there has never been a time period in gaming that was flooded with so many quality titles. Even games like Timeshift that has seems middle of the road now 1-2 years ago would have been one of the top games...now its just another game because the quality is so high. Sorry for the long post.
ARE YOU SAYING THE PS3 doesnt let you download demos????? are you ***in kidding me????
Metal Gear solid will never be on the 360, and actually they are talking about gears of war 2 on the ps3.
PS3 exclusives comparable to 360 are as follows. Warhawk=16 on 16 online, soon to be 32 on 32, no lag whatsoever. Warhawk is comparable to Halo 3 which is the most overrated game in the history of gaming. Play COD4(which is the exact same on both system) then try and go back to the garbage that is halo 3. THen you Unreal Tournament III, which is better than gears of war(that str8 from the developers mouth, not mine, Same developr made the two games.)
Heavenly sword, name one game on 360 thats comparable to that.
Uncharted:drakes fortune, name one game that is on the same level as that.
Haze, will blow halo 3 out of the water.
KIllzone 2, 360 has absolutely nothing that will compare to that game. not now not never.
Stop misleading these kids.
SO YOU PERSONALLY DONT HAVE A PS3????? but yet claim about how the online gaming experience is bad???
LISTEN all that XBL has over PS3 online is in terms of services it offers, nothing with the online gaming experience.
XBL offers Video on demand and more old school games. But when it comes playing someone online, there is no difference, if your experiencing lag online it is either your connection or their connection. its that simple. And if you read that intervieww, you will read that brinkman even says he knows that the ps3 version last year was weaker before he even put the game out.
Let me clear something up for you. Multiplatform games HAVE, key word have, looked better on 360 due to the fact that they have been porting them from the 360 to the ps3. hence degrading the quality of the product. They had less than year to work with the ps3 and rushed the games out. you Can see the improvements already made by those that have been making the games on the ps3 from the ground up and not just porting them when it comes to COD4. Every game made from the ground up on the ps3 is absolutely gorgeous and plays fine. SImple as that.
Maverick
December 16th, 2007, 01:41 PM
This is fun we are carrying the argument into multiple threads...I dont want to quote everything...but here is a little something
Heavenly sword, name one game on 360 thats comparable to that. I admit we only have bad game here.
Uncharted:drakes fortune, name one game that is on the same level as that. Tomb Raider
Haze, will blow halo 3 out of the water.We are talking NOW...not what might be and NOW Halo kills it. Right now Halo is killing a game its never played
KIllzone 2, 360 has absolutely nothing that will compare to that game. not now not never.
Stop misleading these kids. (Once again its not out yet....we are talking NOW)I have played alot of great games that were suppose to be awsome and then ended up sucking or being disappointing.
Now I will list some games and you give me current...not wishfull thinking that the PS3 has that is even close
Bioshock
VF5ONLINE (emphasis on the online)
Mass Effect
Halo 3 (please name the CURRENT game)
Gears of War (once again the CURRENT game)
Ace Combat
Star Trek:Legacy (now I am just messing with you)
Dead Rising
Saints Row
Dance Dance revolution (lol, PS3 isnt keeping up with the new craze of dancing games)
Next we will look at games side by side...features, online play, graphics etc.
Also dont fool anybody here into thinking they can get a game online as easy on the PS3
tmoneymill
December 16th, 2007, 01:52 PM
This is fun we are carrying the argument into multiple threads...I dont want to quote everything...but here is a little something
Heavenly sword, name one game on 360 thats comparable to that. I admit we only have bad game here.
Uncharted:drakes fortune, name one game that is on the same level as that. Tomb Raider
Haze, will blow halo 3 out of the water.We are talking NOW...not what might be and NOW Halo kills it. Right now Halo is killing a game its never played
KIllzone 2, 360 has absolutely nothing that will compare to that game. not now not never.
Stop misleading these kids. (Once again its not out yet....we are talking NOW)I have played alot of great games that were suppose to be awsome and then ended up sucking or being disappointing.
Now I will list some games and you give me current...not wishfull thinking that the PS3 has that is even close
Bioshock
VF5ONLINE (emphasis on the online)
Mass Effect
Halo 3 (please name the CURRENT game)
Gears of War (once again the CURRENT game)
Ace Combat
Star Trek:Legacy (now I am just messing with you)
Dead Rising
Saints Row
Dance Dance revolution (lol, PS3 isnt keeping up with the new craze of dancing games)
Next we will look at games side by side...features, online play, graphics etc.
Also dont fool anybody here into thinking they can get a game online as easy on the PS3
ONCE AGAIN< if you compare tomb raider to uncharted, your missing out on one of the best adventure games out there, period.
Bioshock, soon to be a ps3 game. http://www.psu.com/BioShock-for-the-PS3-Confirmed,-Yet-Again-News--a1012-p0.php
HALO3, ever played warhawk online????? 16 on 16, soon to be 32 on 32. no lag no nothing. smooth and more entertaining that halo 3.
Gears of War=UNREAL TOURNAMENT III. BETTER GAME, str8 from developers mouth.
ALSO, you have to remember that the ps3 has been out for a lil over a year. all those games you mentioned came out in year 2 of the 360. So we can compare these titles to those that will be coming out this year for the ps3.
sleepytercel
December 16th, 2007, 02:20 PM
"Hi, I'm So and So, and I have this system. Since I bought this system, I'll be biased on every fact that I post on the boards. My system is the best because I bought it and need a reason to believe that I made the right purchase. Everything I say is right since I made the correct decision. If someone else purchased a different system, then they are stupid, and I'm going to make sure that they know it."
Translation - BLAH BLAH BLAH
tmoneymill
December 16th, 2007, 02:26 PM
YOuR the one acting like a lil bytch sleepy. its hard to believe a system is better than the 360 isnt it????? once again, ive never said the 360 is crap or worthless. never. take a look at all my posts. you sound like a lil bytch that has no clue about anything.
PS3 is a great entertainment system as is 360. but you cant argue the fact that sony knows what they are doing when it comes to video games. You can make all the assumptions you want about how ps3 hasnt proven anything. DO YOU HAVE A PS3?????? do you know what it is capable of doing???? or do you just get on xbox.com and read what every 360 fanboy types on there.
sleepytercel
December 16th, 2007, 02:33 PM
YOuR the one acting like a lil bytch sleepy. its hard to believe a system is better than the 360 isnt it????? once again, ive never said the 360 is crap or worthless. never. take a look at all my posts. you sound like a lil bytch that has no clue about anything.
PS3 is a great entertainment system as is 360. but you cant argue the fact that sony knows what they are doing when it comes to video games. You can make all the assumptions you want about how ps3 hasnt proven anything. DO YOU HAVE A PS3?????? do you know what it is capable of doing???? or do you just get on xbox.com and read what every 360 fanboy types on there.
Trust me, I'm much more informative than you. The tone in your posts makes it sound like you are crying, and you seem to desperately be seeking attention for someone to agree with you. I never said anything bad about any system, and I didn't talk any system up. It just sounds like you are trying to force people to believe your "OPINIONS" and you disregard the fact that people are happy with what they choose. You talking about the PS3 in every post will do nothing for anyone. However, I know what the PS3 can do, and I know what the 360 can do.
I don't own a PS3, but because I have no interest in it. I have one next-gen system and I've done made my purchase. However, I'm not going to hop on every post and force people to believe in the 360. I mean, seriously, in your posts on the NBA2K8 forum you have to make sure that people know that you're playing the PS3 version. On the contrary, you sound like you lack a lot of information outside the PS3.
chad0034
December 16th, 2007, 02:36 PM
"Hi, I'm So and So, and I have this system. Since I bought this system, I'll be biased on every fact that I post on the boards. My system is the best because I bought it and need a reason to believe that I made the right purchase. Everything I say is right since I made the correct decision. If someone else purchased a different system, then they are stupid, and I'm going to make sure that they know it."
Translation - BLAH BLAH BLAH
THAT was hilarious lol :rotfl:
tmoneymill
December 16th, 2007, 02:40 PM
Trust me, I'm much more informative than you. The tone in your posts makes it sound like you are crying, and you seem to desperately be seeking attention for someone to agree with you. I never said anything bad about any system, and I didn't talk any system up. It just sounds like you are trying to force people to believe your "OPINIONS" and you disregard the fact that people are happy with what they choose. You talking about the PS3 in every post will do nothing for anyone. However, I know what the PS3 can do, and I know what the 360 can do.
I don't own a PS3, but because I have no interest in it. I have one next-gen system and I've done made my purchase. However, I'm not going to hop on every post and force people to believe in the 360. I mean, seriously, in your posts on the NBA2K8 forum you have to make sure that people know that you're playing the PS3 version. On the contrary, you sound like you lack a lot of information outside the PS3.
Find me a post that makes a point im playing the ps3 version...find it. id like to see it. That kid said ps3 has no exclusives worth playing, that online is unplayable. what i did was prove the contrary. thats all. oh and you can tell the tone of my thoughts from words typed in a forum. Yup your more informative. I think all you said was something about the graphics card, thats it. Thats informative yup. i provided links for people to read, that werent my thoughts, wasnt me forcing you to buy a ps3. the 360 owners are the ones always saying how the ps3 will never pan out, doesnt have games, doesnt offer anything new. So hell yes im gonna set them str8. When did i come on here and post about how the 360 doesnt offer anything, or have any games worth playing. i did simple comparisions that were informative.
sleepytercel
December 16th, 2007, 02:54 PM
Find me a post that makes a point im playing the ps3 version...find it. id like to see it. That kid said ps3 has no exclusives worth playing, that online is unplayable. what i did was prove the contrary. thats all. oh and you can tell the tone of my thoughts from words typed in a forum. Yup your more informative. I think all you said was something about the graphics card, thats it. Thats informative yup. i provided links for people to read, that werent my thoughts, wasnt me forcing you to buy a ps3. the 360 owners are the ones always saying how the ps3 will never pan out, doesnt have games, doesnt offer anything new. So hell yes im gonna set them str8. When did i come on here and post about how the 360 doesnt offer anything, or have any games worth playing. i did simple comparisions that were informative.
I've never made any posts about the graphics card. You might want to re-evaluate what I've written because you're now getting posts mixed up. That's alright, I wouldn't expect a whole lot anyway. The only thing I've pretty much said is that people will like whatever they buy, and your "educating" will most likely not change their minds. You ignore many facts and scew them into your own beliefs and then pass them off as true.
Your link about Bioshock going to PS3 has no credibility. The game was originally supposed to be multi-platform, and there was some PS3 code in the game source. This was found on the PC version of the game. It doesn't mean that the game will come for PS3. Also, here's a nice tidbit that you've missed from the lead designer of "Bioshock";
Bioshock lead designer Ken Levine responds quite clearly, "I promise you, there is no secret plan about the PS3 that we're keeping from people. There's no PS3 development going on that we're hiding. There's lots of stuff that gets into game code, plans change over time and we got an exclusive deal with Microsoft ... that's not a Rosetta Stone discovery."
Amazing what a little more information can get you. However, I'm not that informative I guess. Also, your tone is based on the words expressed. It's simple English logic. Using terms like "acting like a bytch" and typing many statements in "ALL CAPS" tells me that you're getting frustrated. I can visually picture a dude typing loud and as fast as he can in anger.
Last, and not least, your post: http://www.2ksports.com/forums/showthread.php?p=1525906#post1525906 It's the first thing you say.
I'm done responding. We're just going to be running in circles.
tmoneymill
December 16th, 2007, 03:22 PM
"tmoneymill, you should hit me up on XBL (assuming you have a 360, and XBL)"
hahahahhahaha, i was responding that directly. letting him know we couldnt play cuz i have a ps3 and he has a 360 lol. talk about informative. why dont you read entire threads before trying to make a fool of someone, cuz now you look like a fool. OWNED. and the caps is to emphasis a point, not to cry about anything.
sleepytercel
December 16th, 2007, 03:25 PM
"tmoneymill, you should hit me up on XBL (assuming you have a 360, and XBL)"
hahahahhahaha, i was responding that directly. letting him know we couldnt play cuz i have a ps3 and he has a 360 lol. talk about informative. why dont you read entire threads before trying to make a fool of someone, cuz now you look like a fool. OWNED. and the caps is to emphasis a point, not to cry about anything.
Oh, you so got me. I missed a tiny one line post. I'm such a fool :rolleyes: . You can now continue your day knowing that you really OWNED someone. At least my foolishness doesn't really span aboout 10 posts. It's my opinion, but I'll pass that off as fact.
tmoneymill
December 16th, 2007, 03:31 PM
yes i can. thank you for bowing down in the presence of greatness. um, and it wasnt a one line post. he was actually talking directly to me that entire post. Just read my friend, and dont assume. Im not here saying oh buy a ps3, 360 sucks. all i have given was information on games that are good for the ps3. your the one that got all butt hurt by it.
If you read some of these fools posts you would understand, but apparantly you just read mine. One kid even said that the ps3 doesnt support headsets, wrong. Another said that online GAMING, not the services, dont even work on the ps3. And you tell me that Im forcing the ps3 down their throats.
Listen to me, as long as i can buy a game, click on the online section, go online get in a lobby and play someone else besides the cpu, that it offers an online experience.
Yes XBL services are far beyond what the PSN has to offer. But as far as gaming online, they are the same. You see your friend online you join their game and blam your playing right along with them. Am i wrong??
sleepytercel
December 16th, 2007, 03:43 PM
Bioshock, soon to be a ps3 game. http://www.psu.com/BioShock-for-the-PS3-Confirmed,-Yet-Again-News--a1012-p0.php
I see you don't make mistakes either.
http://kotaku.com/gaming/bioshock/bioshock-a-lock-for-ps3-250434.php
It's over. Enjoy your PS3.
Maverick
December 16th, 2007, 05:43 PM
Tmoney...i listed 10 top games that are exclusive to 360 that are from different genres....you were not able to really counter any of them except for Unreal vs Gears. I hate to tell you this...but Unreal III will be coming out for the 360...btw Gears is a 3rd person shooter while Unreal is 1st person...so its not the same genre.
Drake Fortune recieved 8.0 by gamespot and 9.0 by Gametrailer...Tomb Raider 7.5 and 8.7 by Gametrailer. So according to 2 unbiased measures...Drakes is better...but not by much.
Anyway....being that you couldnt come up with games on par with the 10 games I mentioned I will just ask you to give 3 games that are any where near these 3 Xbox exclusives
1. Mass Effect
2. Ace Combat
3. Bioshock
For extra credit...lets see if you have anything that can compete with VFonline, Timeshift, Fable 2, Halo Wars, Lost Odessy, Eternal Sonata, Too Human etc.
btw...Conan 7.5, 8.3 Heavenly Sword 8.0, 7.9 from Gamespot and Gametrailer...yes, Conan isnt exclusive...but my point is that if you get a 360...you can still get a game in that style. Now if you want a Mass Effect, Bioshock or Ace Combat sort of game...you are out of luck if you get the 360.
btw....ace combat and Mass effect are 2 of the best games I have EVER played. btw...r u really comparing Halo 3 to Warhawks...come one man. At least say Unreal compared to Halo...that is a far better argument.
Listen...I agree with Sleepy...people including myself are not going to change their minds...however, I am open to getting PS3...i might get it depending on how much extra cash I have in April and depending on how the Show does compared to MLB2k8
tmoneymill
December 16th, 2007, 09:51 PM
I see you don't make mistakes either.
http://kotaku.com/gaming/bioshock/bioshock-a-lock-for-ps3-250434.php
It's over. Enjoy your PS3.
why dont you check the dates of those two articles then come back and talk.
tmoneymill
December 16th, 2007, 10:11 PM
Tmoney...i listed 10 top games that are exclusive to 360 that are from different genres....you were not able to really counter any of them except for Unreal vs Gears. I hate to tell you this...but Unreal III will be coming out for the 360...btw Gears is a 3rd person shooter while Unreal is 1st person...so its not the same genre.
Drake Fortune recieved 8.0 by gamespot and 9.0 by Gametrailer...Tomb Raider 7.5 and 8.7 by Gametrailer. So according to 2 unbiased measures...Drakes is better...but not by much.
Anyway....being that you couldnt come up with games on par with the 10 games I mentioned I will just ask you to give 3 games that are any where near these 3 Xbox exclusives
1. Mass Effect
2. Ace Combat
3. Bioshock
For extra credit...lets see if you have anything that can compete with VFonline, Timeshift, Fable 2, Halo Wars, Lost Odessy, Eternal Sonata, Too Human etc.
btw...Conan 7.5, 8.3 Heavenly Sword 8.0, 7.9 from Gamespot and Gametrailer...yes, Conan isnt exclusive...but my point is that if you get a 360...you can still get a game in that style. Now if you want a Mass Effect, Bioshock or Ace Combat sort of game...you are out of luck if you get the 360.
btw....ace combat and Mass effect are 2 of the best games I have EVER played. btw...r u really comparing Halo 3 to Warhawks...come one man. At least say Unreal compared to Halo...that is a far better argument.
Listen...I agree with Sleepy...people including myself are not going to change their minds...however, I am open to getting PS3...i might get it depending on how much extra cash I have in April and depending on how the Show does compared to MLB2k8
BEfore i really start, you cant compare CONAN to Heavenly sword. obviously youve never played HS, if you want to compare the two. cuz that is laughauble. AND Y DO YOU KEEP SAYIN TIMESHIFT. timeshift is on both systems.
I DONT play MMO's cuz frankly they are all trash, so those 5 or 6 mmos have no weight here. MMO's are for cpu losers that have no life. So if those are the games you play, then no wonder you think Conan is like heavenly sword and Uncharted like tomb raider.
Go ask someone who has played Uncharted if they think its tomb raider. The answer is no. basically every game that comes out is similiar to another game except for characters.
Your right, the ps3 doesnt have anything compared to the **** that Bioshock and mass effect. you know why, cuz ps3 doesnt do ridicilous sci-fi bull**** that the 360 owners love. SO you wanna talk about games that dont appeal to you, those games dont appeal to me. I prefer realistic games, ones with real weapons and such. Shooting humans not made up creatures.
And yes you can compare Warhawk to Halo 3, A game that most people play for the online experience. And with warhawk you can have more people playing at once. Same with COD4, COD4 is a better game than halo 3. if halo 3 had a different name, it would have got mediocre scores. ALso your asking me to compare first gen ps3 games to 2nd or 3rd gen 360 games. Why dont we wait till the end of 2008 to compare the games on both systems.
So why dont you name me 3 games that came out in the first year of 360 that match. remember that xbox came out in nov 2005. so were talking from nov 2005-jan 06.
1. Uncharted
2. Heavenly Sword
3. Lair (ign gave it a poor rating cuz they couldnt figure out controls and said it was too difficult a game) real good reason to give a game a bad rating. "o its to hard this game sucks"
4. Unreal Tournament III
5. RFOM
6. I can even throw in COD4.
7. Ratchet and Clank
8. Gran turismo Prologue(360 has no racing game that even comes close to this one)
thats 8 quality games in the first year of the ps3. You didnt have that on 360, you were waiting for halo 3. So quit trying to say the ps3 isnt allowed to look to the future. You guys waited over 2 years to get the HOLY halo 3. So yes, i can include the games of next year if you wanna talk bout how ps3 has no games to play.
you can say all you want you have a similiar game to such and such, the fact is you DONt have that game on the 360. Uncharted Is not tomb raider. Ps3 offers more variety in gaming, not just real-time strategies or mmos, with a few fps and sports games thrown in. Dont get it twisted.
sleepytercel
December 16th, 2007, 11:21 PM
why dont you check the dates of those two articles then come back and talk.
Did you simply ignore this?
Then there is the lingering question of the rumored PS3 version of BioShock found in the PC code. Levine responds quite clearly, "I promise you, there is no secret plan about the PS3 that we're keeping from people. There's no PS3 development going on that we're hiding. There's lots of stuff that gets into game code, plans change over time and we got an exclusive deal with Microsoft ... that's not a Rosetta Stone discovery."
Source: Joystiq
Your source states nothing different about the finding. It found PS3 code, that tells us nothing. It's no different than someone finding the "Hot Coffee" source code. You can find this type of stuff all the time. The game was originally supposed to be multi-platform, but MS payed for it to be exlcusive. Who knows, it may come out for PS3, but your news that you love to throw out is not news at all. The statement in the bold print was released right after your source. Levine is the head designer for Bioshock. Are you living in PS3 fantasy land? Seriously, give it a rest. We know you love your PS3, but what is the cause for your effort? You ignore blantant facts based on hope and speculation. When you find concrete facts, we'll talk.
kim kapwan
December 17th, 2007, 07:07 AM
BEfore i really start, you cant compare CONAN to Heavenly sword. obviously youve never played HS, if you want to compare the two. cuz that is laughauble. AND Y DO YOU KEEP SAYIN TIMESHIFT. timeshift is on both systems.
I DONT play MMO's cuz frankly they are all trash, so those 5 or 6 mmos have no weight here. MMO's are for cpu losers that have no life. So if those are the games you play, then no wonder you think Conan is like heavenly sword and Uncharted like tomb raider.
Go ask someone who has played Uncharted if they think its tomb raider. The answer is no. basically every game that comes out is similiar to another game except for characters.
Your right, the ps3 doesnt have anything compared to the **** that Bioshock and mass effect. you know why, cuz ps3 doesnt do ridicilous sci-fi bull**** that the 360 owners love. SO you wanna talk about games that dont appeal to you, those games dont appeal to me. I prefer realistic games, ones with real weapons and such. Shooting humans not made up creatures.
And yes you can compare Warhawk to Halo 3, A game that most people play for the online experience. And with warhawk you can have more people playing at once. Same with COD4, COD4 is a better game than halo 3. if halo 3 had a different name, it would have got mediocre scores. ALso your asking me to compare first gen ps3 games to 2nd or 3rd gen 360 games. Why dont we wait till the end of 2008 to compare the games on both systems.
So why dont you name me 3 games that came out in the first year of 360 that match. remember that xbox came out in nov 2005. so were talking from nov 2005-jan 06.
1. Uncharted
2. Heavenly Sword
3. Lair (ign gave it a poor rating cuz they couldnt figure out controls and said it was too difficult a game) real good reason to give a game a bad rating. "o its to hard this game sucks"
4. Unreal Tournament III
5. RFOM
6. I can even throw in COD4.
7. Ratchet and Clank
8. Gran turismo Prologue(360 has no racing game that even comes close to this one)
thats 8 quality games in the first year of the ps3. You didnt have that on 360, you were waiting for halo 3. So quit trying to say the ps3 isnt allowed to look to the future. You guys waited over 2 years to get the HOLY halo 3. So yes, i can include the games of next year if you wanna talk bout how ps3 has no games to play.
you can say all you want you have a similiar game to such and such, the fact is you DONt have that game on the 360. Uncharted Is not tomb raider. Ps3 offers more variety in gaming, not just real-time strategies or mmos, with a few fps and sports games thrown in. Dont get it twisted.
1.Heavenly sword(conan cant compare but i'd rather play Assassin's Creed over HS >>)
2.MMOS(once again.just because you think there garbage dosent mean they are so if your gonna throw stuff out the window anyone else could.I think rachet and clank sucks.it bores me but that dosent mean its a bad game.
3.Who the hell cares what pn warhawk has?people still get more enjoyment out of halo.so it could have 100 and still not be the point.look at canada's football leauge XD j/k
4.Lair had good Graphics.other then that theres no hiding the fact that its a **** game.if you look at lair as a top tier ps3 game list then you probally thought Custer's Revenge for the Atari was innovating
5.COD4 you can throw off the list because it dosent really matter which system you use for it cause it will still rock
6.and you have a very weak logic on why you can talk about games that havent been out yet Grand turismo has'ant even came out yet so to say 360 has nothing that can come close is stupid and makes you look silly.lair looked good.and well you know the rest.....
7.I think crackdown should get more love because it was a really fun 360 game
8.this is what you said in your post
Your right, the ps3 doesnt have anything compared to the **** that Bioshock and mass effect. you know why, cuz ps3 doesnt do ridicilous sci-fi bull**** that the 360 owners love. SO you wanna talk about games that dont appeal to you, those games dont appeal to me. I prefer realistic games, ones with real weapons and such. Shooting humans not made up creatures.
Now i've never seen a ratchet or clank like creature so tell me whats up. also never seen dragons(lair)?also how can you say that when you posted info on bioshocks possibility of comming to ps3?
Bottom line.yes you are comming off as a wishful ps3 thinker.dose it have the potential.yes.do those people have the desire..............your prefrence is ps3.that dosent mean the ps3 games are better in anyway.if you enjoy them then good but lets not debate game titles anymore
ToyDingo
December 17th, 2007, 07:53 AM
I'd say go with the PS3. Despite being a year late off of the starting line it has a better diverse library of games than the 360. What people tend to forget is that you can import games for the PS3 that would never make it here to the states. And because of that, the PS3 has a bigger library really.
The 360's online community is better than PS3, that's true. But, PS3 servers are mostly lag free from what I've experienced. Plus, the PS3 is meant to be the center of entertainment in your house/apartment. The all around media hub that can play movies, music, games, photos, etc. Plus it can link with your PC and PSP and share content.
I'd say PS3.
tmoneymill
December 17th, 2007, 07:55 AM
and i also said, you cant compare first gen ps3 games to almost 3rd gen 360 titles. So you never really answered my question. what games that came out in the first year of the 360 come anywhere close to what the ps3 is putting out right now??????? In its first year???
Also, Gran turismo prologue is out. You can get the Full game from the *** store, not to mention there have been 2 Grant turismo demos that have been out for quite sometime. These arent just lil demos either, over 15 cars and have online leaderboards and such. So you can already get a feel for how amazing that game is.
And about bioshock....http://www.n4g.com/News-82491.aspx
tmoneymill
December 17th, 2007, 07:56 AM
Yes toy dingo, these 360 users have never played ps3 online. Then say its laggy, based on what???? Ive never had any lag while playing onlie.
kim kapwan
December 17th, 2007, 08:53 AM
and i also said, you cant compare first gen ps3 games to almost 3rd gen 360 titles. So you never really answered my question. what games that came out in the first year of the 360 come anywhere close to what the ps3 is putting out right now??????? In its first year???
Also, Gran turismo prologue is out. You can get the Full game from the *** store, not to mention there have been 2 Grant turismo demos that have been out for quite sometime. These arent just lil demos either, over 15 cars and have online leaderboards and such. So you can already get a feel for how amazing that game is.
And about bioshock....http://www.n4g.com/News-82491.aspx
1.show me a store in the u.s thats selling GT
2.the ps3 launched with wack titles to start off and eventually started to get better.so this whole oh you cant compare 1gen ps3 games to 3gen 360 games is stupid .and why not?for all the wait they made for the ps3 it would danm have to put out some good titles to not go completely down the ****ern from the negative advertisment it recived.dont get me wrong.I've played ps3 often at my uncles house.and I do plan on getting one myself.but lets be honest here.the only good game ps3 had at launch was Resistance. Excellent game but come on.not everyones into that.360 launched in like 05 with COD2 and PD so of course the ps3 is gonna have time to try and get good for launch.but the 360 has improved in its games so it shows there moving foward.The guy who Originally posted this is'ant even responding anymore so lets just put this thread to rest
Tribefansince1990
December 17th, 2007, 09:04 AM
Im not getting to into this I like PS3 and thats that but i dont feel like going through why its better its too long to state but heres some fun info
Blu Ray KILLING HD dvd more and more by the month only thing they really have is Tranformers check this out: http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/12/14/nielsen-videoscan-high-def-market-share-for-week-ending-december/
and to those guys who like their halo and all that despite this game not having online Uncharted Drakes Fortune is AWESOME im not even really into action adventure but this game is just sick and teh best part its just a regular guy no stupid gear wearing crap or dumb storylines this game is great as for exclusives this is the one game more so then heavenly sword that PS3 owners can hold over xbox' head its AWESOME looks awesome plays awesome just everything check out IGN review on it 9.1 that doesnt happen often and its all truth this game is great
tmoneymill
December 17th, 2007, 09:05 AM
Re read my thread, i said GT5 prologue was available in the hong kong store and it will be in us in jan.
RFOM is a much better launch game than COD2 and PD. 360 didnt have much when it first launched as a console. So yes, im allowed to compare first gen ps3 games to tha of 360 first gen games. Especially since some first gen ps3 games look better than 3rd gen 360 games. And they will only get better. Look at ps2, not so great first gen games, but games got better every year. PS3 has caught up to the 360 in one year.
kim kapwan
December 17th, 2007, 09:35 AM
Tribefansince1990:yeah sorry but the whole hey guys blue ray is winning so that means were winning thing kinda has no relavence
tmoneymill:thats funny because it pretty much said and quate "Gran turismo prologue is out. You can get the Full game from the *** store".so WTF?and starting off with a $600 to begin with could they allow there Graphics to be that far ****y?Far as Graphics go 360 still has the edge although dont ge me wrong ps3 has some breath taking graphics.PS3 did'ant catch 360 in one year.they just released what they were sapposed to release.By the time ps3 was released there were higher expectations so of course ps3 fans wanna low ball MS fans by saying lets compare the 1 gen release,.And its funny how you talk about the ps3s future and forget about microsofts.as if there not gonna try to step there game up in the comming years as well.also one thing.Graphic wise 1 gen on next gen point would probally go to ps3 but overall fun factor goes to 360
tmoneymill
December 17th, 2007, 10:09 AM
they bleeped out japan, cuz i just put J A P. what were you trying to say when you said starting off at $600 to begin with could they allow there graphics to be that far WHAT???? Yes ps3 caught the 360 and even surpassed them if you play unreal Tournament III. Microsoft has pretty much tapped out their power of thier system, They are now borrowing from sony (unreal engine), in order to compete with PS3. Then M$ had to put out a whole another system, pretty much same as the 1st one. you gotta understand that the reason 360 is outselling PS3 is because people are rebuying the ELite, even though they already have a 360. so your getting multiple purchases from one consumer. The elite is a total disgrace to those who bought the original 360. It just shows M$ just wants your money and really dont care about the consumer.
kim kapwan
December 17th, 2007, 01:07 PM
they bleeped out japan, cuz i just put J A P. what were you trying to say when you said starting off at $600 to begin with could they allow there graphics to be that far WHAT???? Yes ps3 caught the 360 and even surpassed them if you play unreal Tournament III. Microsoft has pretty much tapped out their power of thier system, They are now borrowing from sony (unreal engine), in order to compete with PS3. Then M$ had to put out a whole another system, pretty much same as the 1st one. you gotta understand that the reason 360 is outselling PS3 is because people are rebuying the ELite, even though they already have a 360. so your getting multiple purchases from one consumer. The elite is a total disgrace to those who bought the original 360. It just shows M$ just wants your money and really dont care about the consumer.
microsoft wants are money?guess what so dose sony.so i guess nintendo is the company that really cares about us the consumer.XD
tmoneymill
December 17th, 2007, 01:29 PM
i knew i was dealing with an adolescence. microsoft wants "are" money????? you mean our. and sony doesnt require you to buy simple add-ons that they could have added on from the beginning.
kim kapwan
December 17th, 2007, 01:32 PM
i knew i was dealing with an adolescence. microsoft wants "are" money????? you mean our. and sony doesnt require you to buy simple add-ons that they could have added on from the beginning.
oh dear god get over yourself.***** and moan all you like but its over.you have your view and i have mine.
Tribefansince1990
December 17th, 2007, 01:35 PM
dissing people on spelling mistakes is weak dude, and as for my blu ray post it does have revelance its just another reason why sony is a better machine, a blu ray player for well under retail value.
and xbox wants u to fork out another $200 for HDDVD which is nothing anyways, and on top of that if u dont have an elite u have to buy extra cables for your HD dvd player hmm lets see they both want our money but whos making the smarter choices, not u kim not u
tmoneymill
December 17th, 2007, 01:42 PM
it wasnt a spelling mistake, it was total grammar mistake that makes the sentence not a sentence. Theres a difference. our and are, Our not the same things lol. Not on myself dude, you just have no clue what your talking about half the time.
kim kapwan
December 17th, 2007, 01:50 PM
Tribefansince1990:Your Assuming im actually putting money into that area.im perfectly content with the way my 360 is.I respect you views and Oppinons but to make a thread that says im telling you guys get a ps3 have options sounds pretty one sided.there are positives and negatives about all systems so would'ant giving yourself the most options be getting all systems eventually?
tmoneymill: Dude seriously.Go outside or something.because yeah.your acting like an ***
tmoneymill
December 17th, 2007, 02:23 PM
relax there buddy. hes right though when it comes to baseball games. PS3 does have an option between 2 bball games, while 360 users have 1. All he is saying is that mlb 2k7 wasnt that great of a product and if 2k8 follows that trend you can play The show. Something you cant do on the 360. Understand now????
kim kapwan
December 17th, 2007, 02:35 PM
relax there buddy. hes right though when it comes to baseball games. PS3 does have an option between 2 bball games, while 360 users have 1. All he is saying is that mlb 2k7 wasnt that great of a product and if 2k8 follows that trend you can play The show. Something you cant do on the 360. Understand now????
1.your the one that needs to relax cause you've been doin nothin but Arguing with everyone:p
2:there is still a diffrence between adding a counsle to you entertainment and subtracting and adding one
3.im tired so im gonna catch some zzz's.good night dudes and dudets
Maverick
December 17th, 2007, 03:41 PM
BEfore i really start, you cant compare CONAN to Heavenly sword. obviously youve never played HS, if you want to compare the two. cuz that is laughauble. AND Y DO YOU KEEP SAYIN TIMESHIFT. timeshift is on both systems.
I DONT play MMO's cuz frankly they are all trash, so those 5 or 6 mmos have no weight here. MMO's are for cpu losers that have no life. So if those are the games you play, then no wonder you think Conan is like heavenly sword and Uncharted like tomb raider.
Go ask someone who has played Uncharted if they think its tomb raider. The answer is no. basically every game that comes out is similiar to another game except for characters.
Your right, the ps3 doesnt have anything compared to the **** that Bioshock and mass effect. you know why, cuz ps3 doesnt do ridicilous sci-fi bull**** that the 360 owners love. SO you wanna talk about games that dont appeal to you, those games dont appeal to me. I prefer realistic games, ones with real weapons and such. Shooting humans not made up creatures.
And yes you can compare Warhawk to Halo 3, A game that most people play for the online experience. And with warhawk you can have more people playing at once. Same with COD4, COD4 is a better game than halo 3. if halo 3 had a different name, it would have got mediocre scores. ALso your asking me to compare first gen ps3 games to 2nd or 3rd gen 360 games. Why dont we wait till the end of 2008 to compare the games on both systems.
So why dont you name me 3 games that came out in the first year of 360 that match. remember that xbox came out in nov 2005. so were talking from nov 2005-jan 06.
1. Uncharted
2. Heavenly Sword
3. Lair (ign gave it a poor rating cuz they couldnt figure out controls and said it was too difficult a game) real good reason to give a game a bad rating. "o its to hard this game sucks"
4. Unreal Tournament III
5. RFOM
6. I can even throw in COD4.
7. Ratchet and Clank
8. Gran turismo Prologue(360 has no racing game that even comes close to this one)
thats 8 quality games in the first year of the ps3. You didnt have that on 360, you were waiting for halo 3. So quit trying to say the ps3 isnt allowed to look to the future. You guys waited over 2 years to get the HOLY halo 3. So yes, i can include the games of next year if you wanna talk bout how ps3 has no games to play.
you can say all you want you have a similiar game to such and such, the fact is you DONt have that game on the 360. Uncharted Is not tomb raider. Ps3 offers more variety in gaming, not just real-time strategies or mmos, with a few fps and sports games thrown in. Dont get it twisted.
you are fun to mess with...but I noticed that you asked me to come up with games without you coming up for comparable games.
Now as far as Mass Effect, Ace Combat and Bioshock....not only dont you have a games as good on PS3 but you dont have games that are even in the category...
Yes....you have Heavenly Sword...but if you get a 360 you can still play a game like Conan or Bewulf...they arent as good (yes i know they arent exclusives) but they are at least in the genre. Uncharter->Tomb Raider, Unreal III->Halo3...I dont even know what RFO is...COD4 is on both systems and according to you are equal on both (I personally think it looks better on the 360, Grand Turismo->Project Gotham Racing or Forza Motor sport, Ratchet and Krank -> R u serious...I play big boy games...Gamespot also gave Lair a 4.5 ( I have a feeling I can find a 360 game that can do as well).
After the Ratchet and Krank plus Lair reference I am starting to think you like bad games. That is like me talking about great movies like braveheart, Scarface, Star Wars and you comeback with Finding Nemo and then Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure. I mean there is no accounting for taste here. I mean mentioning those titles makes me wonder if its not a question of whats better, but if you have good taste period...but anyway.
Btw...i am not a big Halo fan I didnt get the system for that...in truth I got the system for MLB2K7 (which when I looked at the PS3 version paled in comparison). Even if Halo sucked I would have been more than pleased with my choice.
Seriously though, have you ever played Halo 3, you are one of the biggest Halo haters I have heard...its more than JUST the game that makes it good. Its the online experience, the ability film and rewind....there are so many good things about the game I could keep going. It is more than a one trick pony of a game. I actually had low expectations for the game to be honest...but I was pleasantly surprised. You should really rent a 360 or go to a friends house and really play around with it.
Also if you play Ace Combat with the flight stick on a big screen (57 inches) in HD...it is one of the best gaming experiences I have ever had.
tmoneymill
December 17th, 2007, 04:53 PM
you comparing conan and beowulf to Heavenly sword is like comparing those movies to each other. Actually ratchet and Klank is a pretty good game with good graphics. Mlb 2k7 was dive last year for the ps3, brinkman even admitted it, but the gameplay was the same on both systems. RFOM, resistance fall of man. you cant compare forza to gran turismo either.(have you even seen that game)????
CONAN and beowulf cant even be put in the same sentence as heavenly sword, ask any respectable gamer and they will tell you that.
The whole halo franchise, in my opinion, has been overrated its whole lifespan. there are better FPS out there than this. Yes HAlo 1 might have been revolutionary in terms of online, but every game has caught up to it that is online. Same with madden, madden has got worse every year it came out, it peaked back in 05. Now, the next gen maddens are terrible, its a disgrace to football. guys run around like they got something stuck up their azzes. Ill give you ace combat, but bioshock and mass effect dont appeal to me, same with half life and those "type" of games. Now counterstrike on the other hand, is dank as f_k, but its limited to my pc.
I have played Halo3 and one my die hard 360 friends cant even play it anymore after buying COD4, said halo bores him now.
Seems your the one more biased than me, cuz COD4 is exactly the same on both systems, the developers even said that. And that goes to show that developers that make games from the ground up instead of just porting them, can produce better quality games. Porting games hurt whichever system its being ported to.
But i still cant believe you wanna compare conan and beowulf to Heavenly sword.
chad0034
December 17th, 2007, 05:05 PM
ENOUGH !!! of this .. whoever likes PS3 likes PS3 .. and whoever likes XBOX likes XBOX .. its that simple...
but by the way ... XBOX is better ... lol jk
it is tho
tmoneymill
December 17th, 2007, 05:08 PM
thats your opinion and i respect that, even though its a blanket statement. Ps3 allows alot of things that your common 360 users dont know about it.
Maverick
December 17th, 2007, 09:39 PM
But i still cant believe you wanna compare conan and beowulf to Heavenly sword.
lol...this comment is coming from the guy who said Lair was good.
i did acknowledge that heavenly sword is better...my point is that there is something to compare it to and that you can have a similar experience on the 360. I am still waiting on your Ace Combat, Bioshock and Mass Effect comparison. You dont have ANYTHING in their league.
As I have said before it is a matter of preference. Its not what system is better, but more of what you are looking for in a system. If you are into...lol Patchit and Klank and solid graphics then the choice is obvious PS3...if you like top quatlity games with a great online community and the best graphics on a home console....360 is the way to go.
listen some people like filet mignon (360) other people are content with hamburger helper (pS3). Who am i to judge peoples preference? I mean after all they are both meat....I guess.
REDSFAN2004
December 17th, 2007, 10:35 PM
Im not going to read that cuz i can already assume whats its saying, and yes xbox is winning the war for sure but like i said before the future is alot different and all these sports tittles will be ported to 360 from PS3 much like 2K8 and Burnout will be it doesnt matter though like we said time will tell anyways.hehe tittles sorry couldn't help myself.:lol:
tmoneymill
December 17th, 2007, 11:23 PM
Lair graphically was a good game, and shows what the ps3 is capable of doing graphically. They just couldnt get the controls right. and about heavenly sword and conan, who cares if they are the same genres, they are two totally different games. that would be like comparing Halo 3 to blacksite:area 51, both first person shooter genre, but totally different experience and game. So would it be ok if said well if i want to play a fPs for ps3 id get blacksite, cuz its the same genre as Halo 3??????
Maverick
December 18th, 2007, 05:56 PM
Lair graphically was a good game, and shows what the ps3 is capable of doing graphically. They just couldnt get the controls right. and about heavenly sword and conan, who cares if they are the same genres, they are two totally different games. that would be like comparing Halo 3 to blacksite:area 51, both first person shooter genre, but totally different experience and game. So would it be ok if said well if i want to play a fPs for ps3 id get blacksite, cuz its the same genre as Halo 3??????
You could say that...but its clear Halo is better. Heaven Sword and Conan are both action adventure hackem slashem games. so they are little closer...if the protagonist in heavenly sword was a man would the 2 games be really that much different
Also I am still waiting for the PS3 games that are in the same league as Bioshock, Ace Combat and Mass Effect. i will save you the time. THERE IS NONE. As far as Lair goes...a game is more than just graphics. When we are talking top games you cant throw in a game that is almos unplayable into the conversation....Anyway, i think my point about the current superiority of the 360 has been made. I hope the PS3 improves and makes the competition tougher, so I am rooting for the PS...like I said...I might get one, especially if MLB2k sux. But we will have to wait and see.
Tribefansince1990
December 18th, 2007, 06:14 PM
Uncharted Drakes Fortune Is kick ***!
tmoneymill
December 18th, 2007, 07:30 PM
About halo 3...do you know it only runs in something like 620p???? hows that for showing off the power of the 360, it cant even run its best game at 720p. Have you played Heavenly sword??? just a question. cuz if you have, then you would know its the same as me comparing blacksite to halo 3.
Maverick
December 19th, 2007, 01:05 PM
About halo 3...do you know it only runs in something like 620p???? hows that for showing off the power of the 360, it cant even run its best game at 720p. Have you played Heavenly sword??? just a question. cuz if you have, then you would know its the same as me comparing blacksite to halo 3.
I never said Halo 3 was the greatest game ever with the best graphics...like I said I am not a huge Halo fanboy. I like the game but its not like I am running around with a "Master Cheif is My Savior" t-shirt. It is a solid game and the game is more than its graphics imo there is sooo much replay value. As far as Heavenly Sword...I played it for about 2 mins at a friends house. I am not a big fan of that style of game. I think they are both action adv. hackem slashem. I think the same person who loves God of War will like both of these games.