View Full Version : refs
STEEL_GORILLA_PIMP
September 26th, 2003, 02:12 PM
what u think!
BigMike34
September 26th, 2003, 06:42 PM
well only if theres a shot attempt, but i guess thats what u meant
Blackwiz
September 26th, 2003, 06:57 PM
i think it's pointless having refs look at a replay to decide a foul(if that's wat u mean)cuz the cpu will know if there was a foul or not, so it's not like if the ref looks at it, he can manual change his mind.
ludacris06
September 26th, 2003, 08:46 PM
It adds realism but I dont care.
Billy King
September 26th, 2003, 11:45 PM
yeah, that would be a small feature i'd expect VC to add some time soon.
it's not to decide a foul, it's the end of the quarter baskets (shot clock violations)
ludacris06
September 27th, 2003, 09:42 AM
That brings back bad memories. 2002 NBA playoffs Boston vs. Detroit. Refs waive off Stackhouse's game winning three at the end of the 4th quarter. If that never happend, Stack would prolly still be a Piston. :cry:
4getMaddenNOW
September 27th, 2003, 08:12 PM
i would also like to see the backboard light up when time runs out like in the nba last yr
ludacris06
September 27th, 2003, 08:13 PM
It will.
Phila_Iverson_03
May 5th, 2004, 06:43 PM
They have this in Live..
its pretty boring how they did it..
i would like to see it though!
Sleepwalkers
May 5th, 2004, 06:54 PM
That brings back bad memories. 2002 NBA playoffs Boston vs. Detroit. Refs waive off Stackhouse's game winning three at the end of the 4th quarter. If that never happend, Stack would prolly still be a Piston. :cry:
Like the Pistons are hurting without him... :D
Getting rid of Stack and Hill were the two best moves they've done.
whigsplittaz
May 5th, 2004, 07:06 PM
Stack had to go because he was not a team player, and think about it Hamilton is younger, cheaper, more of a team player, and not to forget more efficient. Now then with that said is their a real reason why we should have kept stackhouse? Joe D has done a tremendous job in the front office, and the moves he is making not only fit his mold, but they are a class act, and none carry weight of off the court problems with them. Did I mention he is making money for the franchise as well?
Sorry Jerry you wanted to be the man be the man in washington. Jerry has game, but rip has GAME.
og15
May 5th, 2004, 10:42 PM
Sorry but I do not like Stack and the Pistons arem uch better without him, I'm a Wizards fan though and wish we had kept Rip.
Stack = No Defense, Bad Shooter, Selfish, Low % shooter, Can get to the line very well though, Can't rebound a lick, Can Pass okay, Turns over the ball a lot, Now Injury Prone, and Needs to leave the Wizards.
Yes the reviewing the last shot is in Live, and it's nice just adds some realism, no Wiz, it's not for fouls, but their are challenges in NFL games, and the computer gets stuff wrong there so it could work with fouls in a sense.
ut_jazz
May 5th, 2004, 10:47 PM
i think it's pointless having refs look at a replay to decide a foul(if that's wat u mean)cuz the cpu will know if there was a foul or not, so it's not like if the ref looks at it, he can manual change his mind.
exactly
Penny
May 5th, 2004, 11:58 PM
next time you hit a buzzer watch the refs they actually go to the replay, they nod their heads because it has already gone in, no decisions to be made, but they do go to the screen, seems abiut pointless though if nothing will change as a result
but in the game, you can tell because if the commentators say it went in you beat the clock if they say "to bad close game" opr whatever, you know you have lost
very predictable in that sense
:x
Billy King
May 6th, 2004, 12:00 AM
STEEL_GORILLA_****
Waterboy
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2003 9:12 pm
alright, who's bringing up old posts.
Penny
May 6th, 2004, 12:05 AM
alright, who's bringing up old posts.
lol I thought this was just new
my bad shouldnt have answered
but yeah who is brigning up old threads??? :shock: :?