PDA

View Full Version : Compare these T-Mac Pics


lakerkid
August 19th, 2006, 04:48 PM
Ok, so i was browsing through the NBA Live 07 forums when I found this thread...

They are comparing the Live pic to the 2K7 pic. Which do you think is better?

CLICK HERE (http://forums.ea.com/mboards/thread.jspa?sls=2&tstart=0&threadID=103572)

.

AxionJackson24
August 19th, 2006, 04:52 PM
I mean cmon 2k has his lazy eye... Its funny cause like I have stated Ive played both games and 2k is far superior graphically, looks like someone punched Tmac in his grill in the live pic. Hands down 2k.

AxionJackson24
August 19th, 2006, 04:53 PM
Also Rofl at the poster who said " I guess Beauty is in the eye of the Beholder" hahahaha

jesus_wept_
August 19th, 2006, 04:53 PM
neither look anything like t-mac but the live pic looks alot smoother bt thats probably to do with the resolution of the pics.
i dont kno i like both of the pics for different reasons.

lakerkid
August 19th, 2006, 04:56 PM
I can't believe they are just bashing 2K over there like that....man its hard to read that stuff.

AxionJackson24
August 19th, 2006, 05:00 PM
dude its just pathetic cause they want to feel like EA has something better.. in the end most EA fans come to 2k games cause they know good games when they see them.. *cough ..me.. *cough.

Game speaks for itself, and to believe that Live games compare to VC's games is sad.
Its just funny too see that they want to believe live will be better than 2k. When in Essence each year has been a waste of money poored into EA.

AxionJackson24
August 19th, 2006, 05:05 PM
Competition is good though for both cause it makes them want to make each year 10 times better than the last years version. To me though with all that 2k has done to make it 100x better than 2k6, makes me want 2k7 more because the reality is, that Live sucked hardcore last year. Its almost coming up on a year and I still play 2k6 as much as i did when I bought it. So ya no brainer.

deetoman
August 19th, 2006, 05:10 PM
WOW u guys are suprised there bashing 2k but yet we have people over here that bashing ea lol

lakerkid
August 19th, 2006, 05:11 PM
ya all true man. But what keeps both games getting better is the competition between the two...something we are missing in the NFL games these days.

Maine8.7
August 19th, 2006, 05:15 PM
It's kool. They can bash it, but they all know that 2k is better. That one dude was sayin all good things about 2k, but would say, "I just know Live will come through" lol. He's going to change, I can tell, once 2k7 come out. 90% of the fans of Live will switch when 2k7 come out. Only those who are brain washed to believe Live player models look better, or that Live's gameplay is better, will be the one's who stay. Graphically, for the most part, it's been 2k winning in that department. Live won like once. In the gameplay department, 2k has won every year, except 2k4. The gameplay on 2k4 was beyond dead. 2k7 will kill Live again, with better player models, and WAY SUPERIOR GAMEPLAY. As far as the faces go, IMO, one might got a face right, the other might got a face right. It's 50/50 in that department. 2k used to kill in that department to, but either they slowed down or EA caught up. Probably 2k slowed down.

Holla.

AxionJackson24
August 19th, 2006, 05:17 PM
WOW u guys are suprised there bashing 2k but yet we have people over here that bashing ea lol

I bash because Ive been ripped off with false marketing and left with a POS every year.. so I have some anger towards EA, ya.

I think it was like live 04 or something where they "revamped" everything. Dude it was the same game.. no different. Its a ploy that bigger companies use cause they know ppl will buy there product no matter what. Whereas VC accually has to put out a good product in order to sell.

So ya i love bashing EA kthx

hesk
August 19th, 2006, 05:36 PM
game bashing is funny to me. as well as typing out arguments in a forum. ea gon do thet thang and 2k gon do they thang. im scared to see what 2k has in store for 2k8!

hesk
August 19th, 2006, 05:37 PM
ea fanboys say that the cloth physics are over done.
go figure. no one can just give props where props are due.

MaseMurder
August 19th, 2006, 05:38 PM
Live is gone kill 2k7.

AxionJackson24
August 19th, 2006, 05:40 PM
Live is gone kill 2k7.

:thumbsup: :rotfl:

ZEEKDAVILLE24
August 19th, 2006, 05:43 PM
Live one looks good it just there jersey sims are nothing like 2k's.

Xboxing2006
August 19th, 2006, 05:47 PM
T-Mac is off in both games.. Problem is for Live T-mac is Lives coverboy.

Also T-mac looks better in the most recent 2k7 pics. That other one is old.

Rene
August 19th, 2006, 07:52 PM
Live is gone kill 2k7.
good joke. that would be funny, wouldnt it?:rotfl:

djt360
August 19th, 2006, 08:01 PM
i dont care how good live 07 is ganna b.i like 2k.im tired of ea lies about total freestyle control since live 04 they was telling lies and makin me by da game.ima get both games 4 da 360 anyway.but can u tell me wat should i get 1st?

lakerkid
August 19th, 2006, 08:19 PM
Live is gone kill 2k7.

:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:


...just when i thought i had heard them all hahahaha

MaseMurder
August 19th, 2006, 08:27 PM
Footwork will make Live better thats the most exciting thing for me as far as B-Ball games and since Rob Jones didnt deliver after saying he had a team working on winning eleven type footwork im still leaning towards Live.

Rene
August 19th, 2006, 08:36 PM
Footwork will make Live better thats the most exciting thing for me as far as B-Ball games and since Rob Jones didnt deliver after saying he had a team working on winning eleven type footwork im still leaning towards Live.
listen mharlem, i dont think live is going to succeed, just get over it ok, im tired of you spamming these boreds.

ksuttonjr76
August 19th, 2006, 08:44 PM
Personally, the 2K pic has more "emotion" and seems more "alive" to me, but other than that...there's really no "defining moments" for neither of the pics. Also, how do you overdo cloth physics?

lakerkid
August 19th, 2006, 08:50 PM
Also, how do you overdo cloth physics?

ahahaha...thats what i've been trying to figure out!

Xx Yankee xX
August 19th, 2006, 08:53 PM
The 2k graphics are much better than EA's for sure. That T-mac Picture from EA looked ok but 2k's was better.

deetoman
August 19th, 2006, 08:56 PM
lol none of them didnt even look like t-mac

MaseMurder
August 19th, 2006, 09:59 PM
listen mharlem, i dont think live is going to succeed, just get over it ok, im tired of you spamming these boreds.

Its my opinion and I dont care what you think, now you get over it and learn how to spell. (boreds)

rocketshero1
August 19th, 2006, 10:13 PM
The 2K7 T-Mac definately needs to be fixed. It's wierd that this was brought up, but since I see nthat screenshot of T-Mac on 2K7 I couldn't believe he was in a Rockets jersey wearing number 1. The skin tone is off, the eyes are off, and the face is waaay off. Live 07has a decent model of him. They at least have his droopy eyes and skin color down. Im a huge rockets fan and plan on buying 2K7 this year, so I hope they seriously fix T-Mac before the final build.

wildman2005
August 19th, 2006, 11:08 PM
I PITY DAT FOOL

wildman2005
August 19th, 2006, 11:09 PM
naw but seriously they need to fix my boy tracy and my boy arenas they waaaaaaay of along wit A.I. face

OBAzone
August 19th, 2006, 11:12 PM
I don't even worry too much about the graphics for either game. It's more about the gameplay and what is more realistic now. You get used to the graphics eventually either way. The gameplay is what will make or break the game.

phillippejr
August 20th, 2006, 12:19 AM
listen mharlem, i dont think live is going to succeed, just get over it ok, im tired of you spamming these boreds.
agreed harlem with is footwork crap.

Allstarballer5
August 20th, 2006, 07:41 AM
They are always saying Live has always had better graphics than 2k, right sure live has in what world are they living in. Maybe Live does have better graphics but who has better gameplay and what game is more simulation b-ball exactly.

JHodge32
August 20th, 2006, 07:54 AM
Well live 06's for the 360 looked like glossed up wood, not the best. If 07 is the same, the the EA fanboys just love ea a lot.

jaywv30
August 20th, 2006, 09:51 AM
The graphics have never been a debate for most people who have followed 2k vs. Live over the years...2k has always been superior graphically....there have been years (2004) when Live had better gameplay but never graphically....check it out....

NBA 2k3 vs. NBA Live 2003
2khttp://www.gameblitz.com/images/nba2k34.jpg
Livehttp://www.nba-hubi.webpark.pl/screeny/6.jpg
ESPN NBA Basketball vs. NBA Live 2004
2khttp://www.nlgaming.com/games/1658/NBA2K4_Xbox_Screen_4.JPG
Livehttp://sportsmedia.ign.com/sports/image/live4inline.jpg
ESPN NBA Basketball 2k5 vs. NBA Live 2005
2khttp://www.tv-spelswebben.se/gamepics/685_3618.jpg
Livehttp://sportsmedia.ign.com/sports/image/Scene1_Final_c_no_logo2inline_1083798092.jpg
NBA 2k6 vs. NBA Live 2006
2khttp://a248.e.akamai.net/f/248/5462/2h/images.gamezone.com/screens/26/7/25/s26725_360_13.jpg
Livehttp://xbox360.qj.net/uploads/articles_module/3524_NBA_Live_2006_1_500.jpg
NBA 2k7 vs. NBA Live 2007
2khttp://www.2ksports.com/_img/screens/nba2k7/nba2k7_081806_5.jpg
Livehttp://www.nba-live.com/nba07/screens/carter07_nextgen.jpg

OBAzone
August 20th, 2006, 10:44 AM
I would have to say that the 2k graphics are still better than what Live has to offer. But there are many others out there to diasgree and have no chance of changing their minds.

CDWJUSTIN
August 20th, 2006, 11:38 AM
they both suck t-mac should have green hair and a red nose and 2 eyes made outa coal...god get him right for once...

Rene
August 20th, 2006, 12:02 PM
they both suck t-mac should have green hair and a red nose and 2 eyes made outa coal...god get him right for once...
:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

freak2k6
August 20th, 2006, 12:26 PM
Carter has a messed up nose on the live pic.

OVzBaCK
August 20th, 2006, 12:28 PM
I am not bias towards neither one of the 2. But, 2k has gotten the best of Live since it dropped for dreamcast. Live, was better maybe one time and it was debatable. The people who think Live has been better than 2k all this time, I bet they are die hard EA fans. Thanks to those EA fans is why all of us basketball game fans dont get the best out of these game producers because they know peolpe will buy the game even if it sucks. P.S. the rim and the way the ball goes threw the rim also is very unrealistic for Live. Oh and the 720 spin move also. I am just telling the truth so don't get mad. I spend my money only on worthy things.

lakerkid
August 20th, 2006, 01:22 PM
ya i see now

MaseMurder
August 20th, 2006, 01:30 PM
Lakerkid have you been spamming lately?

lakerkid
August 20th, 2006, 01:31 PM
Lakerkid have you been spamming lately?

what!?!?!? How could you not see the difference in those pics. 2K is WAAYY better

phillippejr
August 20th, 2006, 01:35 PM
Lakerkid have you been spamming lately?
the only person whodoex that is u.

Prince_RIP4eVa
August 20th, 2006, 01:36 PM
the live pic looks more realistic.. plain and simple... 2k will most likely be better, but live LOOKS more like a real game

phillippejr
August 20th, 2006, 01:37 PM
the live pic looks more realistic.. plain and simple... 2k will most likely be better, but live LOOKS more like a real game
No it doesn't.Look at the vince carter pic.He doesn't look anything like that in real life.

Rene
August 20th, 2006, 01:38 PM
Lakerkid have you been spamming lately?
C'mon mharlem, use your brain, your the only one that spams these boards.

MaseMurder
August 20th, 2006, 01:40 PM
the only person whodoex that is u.

For real look I have a partner now.

http://forums.ea.com/mboards/thread.jspa?threadID=104015&tstart=15

You started to do it.

phillippejr
August 20th, 2006, 01:43 PM
For real look I have a partner now.

http://forums.ea.com/mboards/thread.jspa?threadID=104015&tstart=15

You started to do it.
Thats not me.He has like three post there.I posted there only once, but u spam on a daily basis.

MaseMurder
August 20th, 2006, 01:44 PM
You quit because you got struck by lightning.

phillippejr
August 20th, 2006, 01:47 PM
You quit because you got struck by lightning.
I could of just made another account.I really don't care about those noobs over at the live board.

Rene
August 20th, 2006, 01:47 PM
You quit because you got struck by lightning.
Use your brain mharlem, you spam on a daily basis...and thats a fact, not an opinion. pretty much everybody on these boards hate you.

MaseMurder
August 20th, 2006, 01:53 PM
Use your brain mharlem, you spam on a daily basis...and thats a fact, not an opinion. pretty much everybody on these boards hate you.

I didnt come here for love thats what girls is for. Sometimes you guys need to think befor you speak.

phillippejr
August 20th, 2006, 01:55 PM
I didnt come here for love thats what girls is for. No **** over here.
So u came to spam then?What??if u love live so much why are u always on the 2k board?noting interesting to talk about LMAO

Rene
August 20th, 2006, 01:57 PM
So u came to spam then?What??if u love live so much why are u always on the 2k board?noting interesting to talk about LMAO
I think he has some stuff going on at home;)

MaseMurder
August 20th, 2006, 01:58 PM
So u came to spam then?What??if u love live so much why are u always on the 2k board?noting interesting to talk about LMAO

I like both games and as you can see they have plenty to talk about.

thacarter
August 20th, 2006, 02:00 PM
the live pic looks more realistic.. plain and simple... 2k will most likely be better, but live LOOKS more like a real gamehey can i ask u a question? i remember u being a very big 2kfan but seems u lost all respect for 2K after 2k6 lol

phillippejr
August 20th, 2006, 02:03 PM
I like both games and as you can see they have plenty to talk about.
yeah thtas the reaso u spam on 2k7.Stop ur BS.Go talk about how the pic of VC with ythat weird *** nose.

MuffinMcFluffin
August 20th, 2006, 02:07 PM
Look, I know I'm late on this, but I can't believe the amount of fanboyism on each site (yes, including this one). 2K still needs a lot of work with their cloth and their animations (and their stadium lighting). I don't know what else they need to work on visually except for those. Live, however, needs to work on head/body proportioning, facial expressions, cloth (they need to move), rims, player/court proportioning, etc.

They both have quality stuff, and they have flaws. I don't own a 360, so I don't even care about the next-gen stuff anyway. For me, it's about current-gen, and Live doesn't hold a candle to 2K in current-gen stuff.

MaseMurder
August 20th, 2006, 02:07 PM
yeah thtas the reaso u spam on 2k7.Stop ur BS.Go talk about how the pic of VC with ythat weird *** nose.

Let not talk about faces because 2k7 have serious problems with that.

phillippejr
August 20th, 2006, 02:09 PM
Let not talk about faces because 2k7 have serious problems with that.
No not really.the pic of VC doesn't look noting like him in live.Not even close.

MaseMurder
August 20th, 2006, 02:09 PM
And 2k's do are you serious?

oldskool716
August 20th, 2006, 02:15 PM
all I can say is that I've never seen a screen shot of live look like the real thing. I remember looking at a Slam magazine and seeing a screen shot of Paul Pierce shooting a fadaway on 2k6 and I didn't know it was a game until I read the caption. The biggest thing I had against live 06 is that you needed a magnifying glass to see your players. If you think the faces look better on live I might agree with you a lot of times. but if you think the animations, arenas, fans, and overall look is better I think your crazy. I would never choose live 07 over 2k7. If someone can give me a good reason to then post it.

MaseMurder
August 20th, 2006, 02:22 PM
http://groups.msn.com/SuperstarsoftheNBA/vincecarter.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=264


http://2ksports.com/games/nba2k7/screens/view#2363

http://www.nba-live.com/nba07/screens/carter07c_nextgen.jpg

Look like 2k's nose is messed up to me.

Rene
August 20th, 2006, 02:48 PM
http://groups.msn.com/SuperstarsoftheNBA/vincecarter.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=264


http://2ksports.com/games/nba2k7/screens/view#2363

http://www.nba-live.com/nba07/screens/carter07c_nextgen.jpg

Look like 2k's nose is messed up to me.
Looks like your nose is messed up to me.

Q-Qadgetry
August 20th, 2006, 02:58 PM
Looks like your nose is messed up to me.
...eh http://2ksports.com/forums/images/icons/icon9.gif

phillippejr
August 20th, 2006, 03:21 PM
http://groups.msn.com/SuperstarsoftheNBA/vincecarter.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=264


http://2ksports.com/games/nba2k7/screens/view#2363

http://www.nba-live.com/nba07/screens/carter07c_nextgen.jpg

Look like 2k's nose is messed up to me.
It looks fine.Not like lives LMAO

OVzBaCK
August 20th, 2006, 03:25 PM
Live's pics only look good when it comes to screen shots like this and it still isn't better than 2k's pics. And the actual game graphics doesnt ever look anywhere close for Live. They look somewhat similar to the screen shots only during instant replay.

rodizell
August 20th, 2006, 03:55 PM
Hey check this out on the release date go to your local gamestop here they have both games in the same systems to compare whether it's 360-2K7 vs 360-Live, and I do this every year and 2K is always the best, or go current gen Xbox-2K7 vs Xbox-Live, it doesn't matter, 2K is always better, man I use 2 B a fan of live, 2k then showed up then I compared both, I had an open mind and that's when I switched my thinking to man you never know until that time, but after that every year 2K came alot stronger, hands down.

Free bonds
August 20th, 2006, 04:47 PM
Trying to compare faces that move from screenshots in a videogame is rather stupid.
Most player's dont walk around with a straight face for you to actualy judge how they look.
Depending on what the player may be doing, his face may be contorted to a point where it is simply unrecognizable.

Need proof? Or is my reasoning to much to digest?

Free bonds
August 20th, 2006, 04:52 PM
Ill giveyou proof anyway
Grant hill or Carlos Boozer?
http://groups.msn.com/SuperstarsoftheNBA/granthill.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=1104

Jason Kidd and Jamal Mashburn or Sam Cassell and Eddie Murphy
http://groups.msn.com/SuperstarsoftheNBA/jasonkidd.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=514

T-Mac or Chris Rock
http://groups.msn.com/SuperstarsoftheNBA/tracymcgrady.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=211

mandm825
August 20th, 2006, 05:05 PM
The proof you give is not valid, because even with the faces contorted you still can tell who the player is. But to compare 2k's tmac to Live's tmac, Nba Live looks way better.IMO

Prince_RIP4eVa
August 20th, 2006, 05:27 PM
hey can i ask u a question? i remember u being a very big 2kfan but seems u lost all respect for 2K after 2k6 lol

lol, nah.. well i've never been a fanboy either way. all in all, i'm a 2k fan still, but I love live's next-gen graphics.. definately better than 2k.. but after playing live 06 on the 360 i have doubts on how the game will actually play

jaywv30
August 20th, 2006, 06:22 PM
I just don't see how anyone can say Live's faces are better...to me 2k is way better...check Odom.....

Live
http://www.nba-live.com/nba07/screens/odom07_nextgen.jpg
2k
http://ps3media.ign.com/ps3/image/article/707/707467/nba-2k7-20060510061012987.jpg

wildman2005
August 20th, 2006, 06:39 PM
lol @ at live odom

thebabifacepimp
August 20th, 2006, 06:42 PM
Lol in my opinion it looks like Live took a step back instead of leaping forward on the next gen. I remember last years graphics looking better than this years. And why do all the live players look like they are pale even brown skin people like T-Mac and Odom. Why so pale?? Just compare each of the pics and see the drastic skin tone difference. They're skin tones are way off. 2k always has Vince coloring off but thats one person so its not to bad. I hope all players in live don't look like that.

Chudge
August 20th, 2006, 07:07 PM
the ball looks really good on live

lakerkid
August 20th, 2006, 07:22 PM
ahahahahahahah .... :rotfl: ....man there is something with that LIVE odom. Thats hella funny tho

thacarter
August 20th, 2006, 07:30 PM
Trying to compare faces that move from screenshots in a videogame is rather stupid.
Most player's dont walk around with a straight face for you to actualy judge how they look.
Depending on what the player may be doing, his face may be contorted to a point where it is simply unrecognizable.

Need proof? Or is my reasoning to much to digest?a voice of reason:thumbsup: ..some people are just too stupid to comprehend this. U taking a snapshot at an instant point so why people make such a big fuss over screenshots still remains a mystery to me

lakerkid
August 20th, 2006, 07:33 PM
Look what the Live fanboys (http://forums.ea.com/mboards/thread.jspa?messageID=1030164󻠔) said about the 2 Odom pics.

thacarter
August 20th, 2006, 07:43 PM
lol, nah.. well i've never been a fanboy either way. all in all, i'm a 2k fan still, but I love live's next-gen graphics.. definately better than 2k.. but after playing live 06 on the 360 i have doubts on how the game will actually playaite cool i see

MaseMurder
August 20th, 2006, 09:05 PM
Lol in my opinion it looks like Live took a step back instead of leaping forward on the next gen. I remember last years graphics looking better than this years. And why do all the live players look like they are pale even brown skin people like T-Mac and Odom. Why so pale?? Just compare each of the pics and see the drastic skin tone difference. They're skin tones are way off. 2k always has Vince coloring off but thats one person so its not to bad. I hope all players in live don't look like that.

Those are early builds of the game look at the Dallas and Heat pics and tell me why Dallas crowd is wearing the heat jerseys if those pics is new builds of the game EA have some real issues.

ludacris06
August 20th, 2006, 09:10 PM
^^ Yeah I noticed that. The player models are nice on live, but the overall look is trash. The arenas took a step down from last year from what I'm looking at.

Rene
August 20th, 2006, 11:21 PM
Live is gnna have good graphics again, but gameplay is gonna be trash again, live is good at making hype. i only one live 2004 because i thought it was better than 2k4, but since then, its been about 2k

Free bonds
August 21st, 2006, 05:52 AM
The proof you give is not valid, because even with the faces contorted you still can tell who the player is. But to compare 2k's tmac to Live's tmac, Nba Live looks way better.IMO

Your opinion is welcome, both T-mac's look like T-mac. How is my proof Invalid. Someone's interpretation of a real life subject may not be the same interpretation that you have. 2k's T-mac is more detailed than Live's T-mac, I feel they are both ok, but who cares, your not going to be focused on their face during gameplay.

It's too much harping on little things like player's eyebrow's and such that real gameplay issues dont get the recognization that they deserve.

Give me great rotation defense over a bump-mapped basketball any day.

jrog1906
August 21st, 2006, 07:43 AM
I feel they are both ok, but who cares, your not going to be focused on their face during gameplay.

It's too much harping on little things like player's eyebrow's and such that real gameplay issues dont get the recognization that they deserve.

Give me great rotation defense over a bump-mapped basketball any day.
:thumbsup: Thank you, I would be satisfied w/graphics from a couple years back if the gameplay was decent. I can tell who the players are so it's fine to me. I get excited when I hear that 2k7 will let me explode out of the triple-threat position or I hear about deeper post moves not when I hear stuff like sweat will come off of you when you dunk. I mean it's cool and all but I would rather have gameplay any day over graphics......but that's just me

mharlem
August 21st, 2006, 08:04 AM
Live is gnna have good graphics again, but gameplay is gonna be trash again, live is good at making hype. i only one live 2004 because i thought it was better than 2k4, but since then, its been about 2k

How do you know this have you played Live?

Guess who's back.

lakerkid
August 21st, 2006, 08:18 AM
How do you know this have you played Live?

Guess who's back.

y u bak spamma?

mharlem
August 21st, 2006, 08:22 AM
y u bak spamma?

Dont call me a spamma because I will post links on how you like to go to EA and talk 2k then bring the link back here like you're really doing something.

JHodge32
August 21st, 2006, 08:24 AM
And EA Fanboys get angry at us for talking about NBA 2K7 on their forums.

Fanboys.......

mharlem
August 21st, 2006, 08:28 AM
And EA Fanboys get angry at us for talking about NBA 2K7 on their forums.

Fanboys.......

Im not a fanboy of either I just like what Live is doing this year a little more because of footwork it would have been 2k but it dont look like winning eleven made it this year.

JHodge32
August 21st, 2006, 08:34 AM
Ok I get you

Art1bk
August 21st, 2006, 08:40 AM
Live does have better graphics i agree. Anybody in their right mind will see that. It is much more sharp and clear then 2k but i prefer 2k because of the gameplay. The gameplay on the 2k is great. Live has some ugly animations and very stiff movements IMO. If live can fix that then it will be a good game..

jaywv30
August 21st, 2006, 08:54 AM
Live does have better graphics i agree. Anybody in their right mind will see that. It is much more sharp and clear then 2k but i prefer 2k because of the gameplay. The gameplay on the 2k is great. Live has some ugly animations and very stiff movements IMO. If live can fix that then it will be a good game..

All I know is last year everyone said Live had better graphics but 2k beat it down on my HDTV. This year's games don't look any different from the screenshots at least.

JHodge32
August 21st, 2006, 08:57 AM
Please when you got up close to Live's Players in HD or non-HD, they looked like glossed up wood Not good player models at all, Now the arenas were great in Live 06 for the 360.